Skip to content

chore(build): remove redundant client codegen test#7761

Merged
kuhe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
kuhe/chore/build
Feb 21, 2026
Merged

chore(build): remove redundant client codegen test#7761
kuhe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
kuhe/chore/build

Conversation

@kuhe
Copy link
Contributor

@kuhe kuhe commented Feb 20, 2026

Testing

I tested by running yarn generate-clients -p (protocol tests), verifying no diff afterwards.

Checklist

  • If the PR is a feature, add integration tests (*.integ.spec.ts) or E2E tests.
    • It's not a feature.
  • My E2E tests are resilient to concurrent i/o.
    • I didn't write any E2E tests.
  • I added access level annotations e.g. @public, @internal tags and enabled doc generation on the package. Remember that access level annotations go below the description, not above.
    • I didn't add any public functions.
  • Streams - how do they work?? My WebStream readers/locks are properly lifecycled. Node.js stream backpressure is handled. Error handling.
    • No streams here.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@kuhe kuhe requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2026 23:55
@kuhe kuhe merged commit 58b80de into main Feb 21, 2026
7 checks passed
@kuhe kuhe deleted the kuhe/chore/build branch February 21, 2026 00:04
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2026

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 7, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants