-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
feat(codepipeline-actions): support InspectorEcrImageScanAction
and InspectorSourceCodeScanAction
actions
#33378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This review is outdated)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #33378 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 83.98% 83.98%
=======================================
Files 120 120
Lines 6976 6976
Branches 1178 1178
=======================================
Hits 5859 5859
Misses 1005 1005
Partials 112 112
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
EcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
action
EcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
actionEcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
actions
EcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
actionsInspectorEcrImageScanAction
and InspectorSourceCodeScanAction
actions
test('can get variables', () => { | ||
// WHEN | ||
const inspectorEcrImageScanAction = new cpactions.InspectorEcrImageScanAction({ | ||
actionName: 'InspectorScan', | ||
output: scanOutput, | ||
repository, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// THEN | ||
expect(inspectorEcrImageScanAction.variables.highestScannedSeverity).toMatch(/^#{\${Token\[TOKEN\.[0-9]*\]}.HighestScannedSeverity}$/); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This and other common code are about the common behavior of the base class.
But as users are not aware of the base class because they call the subclasses directly, and in case there are any changes by contributors, it is also confirmation for regressions in the subclasses. Therefore, the tests in inspector-ecr-image-scan-action.test.ts
and inspector-source-code-scan-action.test.ts
are partially identical.
This also makes the test useful even if the base class is deleted and each class is implemented independently in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Great work! 👍 Thanks |
@Mergifyio update |
❌ Mergify doesn't have permission to updateFor security reasons, Mergify can't update this pull request. Try updating locally. |
@5d But the merge process doesn't seem to be running. Could you please address this? |
@Mergifyio update |
❌ Mergify doesn't have permission to updateFor security reasons, Mergify can't update this pull request. Try updating locally. |
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
I updated the branch locally to address the mergify error. In addition, the following changes were made:
Could you please check it again and merge it if you are okay? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see. |
Issue # (if applicable)
Closes #33377.
Reason for this change
AWS CodePipeline introduces new build action: InspectorScan action.
Description of changes
Add
InspectorEcrImageScanAction
andInspectorSourceCodeScanAction
classes that extendsBaseInspectorScan
class.The
BaseInspectorScan
class that extendsAction
class to aws-codepipeline-actions module.Describe any new or updated permissions being added
Description of how you validated changes
Both unit and integ tests
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license