-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
Closed
Labels
@aws-cdk/aws-rdsRelated to Amazon Relational DatabaseRelated to Amazon Relational Databaseeffort/mediumMedium work item – several days of effortMedium work item – several days of effortfeature-requestA feature should be added or improved.A feature should be added or improved.feature/enhancementA new API to make things easier or more intuitive. A catch-all for general feature requests.A new API to make things easier or more intuitive. A catch-all for general feature requests.in-progressThis issue is being actively worked on.This issue is being actively worked on.p1
Description
Description
Instead of creating a new ParameterGroup and referencing it in the props, add a new field readonly parameters?: { [key: string]: string };
to the instance and cluster props that is used to create a ParameterGroup under the hood.
Use Case
Easier way to configure parameters. The parameters field is the only field that is necessary to create a group so it could be provided directly instead of forcing the user to create a group.
Proposed Solution
Add readonly parameters?: { [key: string]: string };
to DatabaseInstanceNew properties and create ParameterGroup internally.
Other information
No response
Acknowledge
- I may be able to implement this feature request
- This feature might incur a breaking change
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
@aws-cdk/aws-rdsRelated to Amazon Relational DatabaseRelated to Amazon Relational Databaseeffort/mediumMedium work item – several days of effortMedium work item – several days of effortfeature-requestA feature should be added or improved.A feature should be added or improved.feature/enhancementA new API to make things easier or more intuitive. A catch-all for general feature requests.A new API to make things easier or more intuitive. A catch-all for general feature requests.in-progressThis issue is being actively worked on.This issue is being actively worked on.p1