[aws-lambda-python] Allow the use of CodeArtifact

[mrpackethead]

Allow the use of CodeArtifact, so that private modules can be loaded from a private repository

Use Case

Many librarys are private, which get used to build lambdas

Proposed Solution

pass parameters for the code-artifact repo to the container.

This is a 🚀 Feature Request

[PierreKiwi]

Thanks @mrpackethead (I suggest you change from code-artifact to CodeArtifact ;)).

The issue #9942 seems to be related as well.

To reiterate what I have shared on Slack, I have solved the problem with Function by first configuring pip using the login command and then I mounted a volume to the Docker container to make my pip.confg available during the build.

my_lambda = aws_lambda.Function(
    self,
    "MyLambdaFunction",
    code=aws_lambda.Code.from_asset(
        "path/to/lambda",
        asset_hash_type=core.AssetHashType.SOURCE,
        bundling=core.BundlingOptions(
            image=aws_lambda.Runtime.PYTHON_3_8.bundling_docker_image,
            command=[
                "bash",
                "-c",
                " && ".join(
                    [
                        "pip install -r requirements.txt -t /asset-output",
                        "cp -au . /asset-output",
                    ]
                ),
            ],
            user="root:root",
            volumes=[
                core.DockerVolume(
                    container_path="/root/.config/pip/pip.conf",
                    host_path=f"{Path.home()}/.config/pip/pip.conf",
                ),
            ],
        ),
    ),
)

[mrpackethead]

maybe this just needs a way to provide a pip config ( it could sit next to the requirements.txt ) to the bundling container.

[eladb]

@adamelmore thoughts?

[adamdotdevin]

@adamelmore thoughts?

@eladb Makes sense to me! I'll wait until #9582 lands as it makes sweeping changes to PythonFunction. Then I should have some bandwidth to take this on.

[lucasam]

👍 Just add one more customer interested on this feature

[eikeon]

@adamelmore thoughts?

@eladb Makes sense to me! I'll wait until #9582 lands as it makes sweeping changes to PythonFunction. Then I should have some bandwidth to take this on.

I believe #9582 has landed. Looking forward to this functionality. TY, all for the work on the CDK

[mrpackethead]

adding to that, I've changed jobs, but the requirment has'tn chagned... @PierreKiwi 's work ( above ) is helpful but it woudl be nice to do this more tiderly.