-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.8k
Update LBFGSSuite.scala #815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Jenkins, test this please. |
Merged build triggered. |
Merged build started. |
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed. |
All automated tests passed. |
can this patch be merged? |
Thanks. I've merged this into master & branch-1.0. |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2014
the same reason as #588 Author: baishuo(白硕) <[email protected]> Closes #815 from baishuo/master and squashes the following commits: 6876c1e [baishuo(白硕)] Update LBFGSSuite.scala (cherry picked from commit a08262d) Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
thanks @rxin |
pdeyhim
pushed a commit
to pdeyhim/spark-1
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2014
the same reason as apache#588 Author: baishuo(白硕) <[email protected]> Closes apache#815 from baishuo/master and squashes the following commits: 6876c1e [baishuo(白硕)] Update LBFGSSuite.scala
cloud-fan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove overriding the description method in the V2 file sources. `FileScan` already uses all the metadata to create the description, so adding the same fields to the overridden description creates duplicates. ### Why are the changes needed? Example parquet scan from the agg pushdown suite: Before: ``` +- BatchScan parquet file:/...[min(_3)#814, max(_3)#815, min(_1)#816, max(_1)#817, count(*)#818L, count(_1)#819L, count(_2)#820L, count(_3)#821L] ParquetScan DataFilters: [], Format: parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex(1 paths)[file:/..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedAggregation: [MIN(_3), MAX(_3), MIN(_1), MAX(_1), COUNT(*), COUNT(_1), COUNT(_2), COUNT(_3)], PushedFilters: [], PushedGroupBy: [], ReadSchema: struct<min(_3):int,max(_3):int,min(_1):int,max(_1):int,count(*):bigint,count(_1):bigint,count(_2)..., PushedFilters: [], PushedAggregation: [MIN(_3), MAX(_3), MIN(_1), MAX(_1), COUNT(*), COUNT(_1), COUNT(_2), COUNT(_3)], PushedGroupBy: [] RuntimeFilters: [] ``` After: ``` +- BatchScan parquet file:/...[min(_3)#814, max(_3)#815, min(_1)#816, max(_1)#817, count(*)#818L, count(_1)#819L, count(_2)#820L, count(_3)#821L] ParquetScan DataFilters: [], Format: parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex(1 paths)[file:/..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedAggregation: [MIN(_3), MAX(_3), MIN(_1), MAX(_1), COUNT(*), COUNT(_1), COUNT(_2), COUNT(_3)], PushedFilters: [], PushedGroupBy: [], ReadSchema: struct<min(_3):int,max(_3):int,min(_1):int,max(_1):int,count(*):bigint,count(_1):bigint,count(_2)... RuntimeFilters: [] ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Just description change in explain output. ### How was this patch tested? Updated a few UTs to accommodate checking explain string. Closes #38229 from Kimahriman/remove-file-source-description. Authored-by: Adam Binford <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
beliefer
pushed a commit
to beliefer/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove overriding the description method in the V2 file sources. `FileScan` already uses all the metadata to create the description, so adding the same fields to the overridden description creates duplicates. ### Why are the changes needed? Example parquet scan from the agg pushdown suite: Before: ``` +- BatchScan parquet file:/...[min(_3)apache#814, max(_3)apache#815, min(_1)apache#816, max(_1)apache#817, count(*)#818L, count(_1)#819L, count(_2)#820L, count(_3)#821L] ParquetScan DataFilters: [], Format: parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex(1 paths)[file:/..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedAggregation: [MIN(_3), MAX(_3), MIN(_1), MAX(_1), COUNT(*), COUNT(_1), COUNT(_2), COUNT(_3)], PushedFilters: [], PushedGroupBy: [], ReadSchema: struct<min(_3):int,max(_3):int,min(_1):int,max(_1):int,count(*):bigint,count(_1):bigint,count(_2)..., PushedFilters: [], PushedAggregation: [MIN(_3), MAX(_3), MIN(_1), MAX(_1), COUNT(*), COUNT(_1), COUNT(_2), COUNT(_3)], PushedGroupBy: [] RuntimeFilters: [] ``` After: ``` +- BatchScan parquet file:/...[min(_3)apache#814, max(_3)apache#815, min(_1)apache#816, max(_1)apache#817, count(*)#818L, count(_1)#819L, count(_2)#820L, count(_3)#821L] ParquetScan DataFilters: [], Format: parquet, Location: InMemoryFileIndex(1 paths)[file:/..., PartitionFilters: [], PushedAggregation: [MIN(_3), MAX(_3), MIN(_1), MAX(_1), COUNT(*), COUNT(_1), COUNT(_2), COUNT(_3)], PushedFilters: [], PushedGroupBy: [], ReadSchema: struct<min(_3):int,max(_3):int,min(_1):int,max(_1):int,count(*):bigint,count(_1):bigint,count(_2)... RuntimeFilters: [] ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Just description change in explain output. ### How was this patch tested? Updated a few UTs to accommodate checking explain string. Closes apache#38229 from Kimahriman/remove-file-source-description. Authored-by: Adam Binford <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the same reason as #588