Skip to content

[SPARK-8037] [SQL] Ignores files whose name starts with dot in HadoopFsRelation #6581

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

liancheng
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 2, 2015

Test build #33978 has finished for PR 6581 at commit d08e97b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

yhuai commented Jun 2, 2015

LGTM

@liancheng
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging to master and branch-1.4.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 1bb5d71 Jun 2, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2015
…FsRelation

Author: Cheng Lian <[email protected]>

Closes #6581 from liancheng/spark-8037 and squashes the following commits:

d08e97b [Cheng Lian] Ignores files whose name starts with dot in HadoopFsRelation

(cherry picked from commit 1bb5d71)
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lian <[email protected]>
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2015
…FsRelation

Author: Cheng Lian <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6581 from liancheng/spark-8037 and squashes the following commits:

d08e97b [Cheng Lian] Ignores files whose name starts with dot in HadoopFsRelation
nemccarthy pushed a commit to nemccarthy/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
…FsRelation

Author: Cheng Lian <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6581 from liancheng/spark-8037 and squashes the following commits:

d08e97b [Cheng Lian] Ignores files whose name starts with dot in HadoopFsRelation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants