Skip to content

[SPARK-4421] Wrong link in spark-standalone.html #3279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tsudukim
Copy link
Contributor

Modified the link of building Spark.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

tsudukim added a commit to tsudukim/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2014
Modified the link of building Spark. (backport version of apache#3279.)
@tsudukim
Copy link
Contributor Author

I sent 2 PRs about SPARK-4421 because the page name are different between Spark 1.2 and Spark 1.1.
This is for Spark 1.2.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2014
Modified the link of building Spark. (backport version of #3279.)

Author: Masayoshi TSUZUKI <[email protected]>

Closes #3280 from tsudukim/feature/SPARK-4421-2 and squashes the following commits:

3b4d38d [Masayoshi TSUZUKI] [SPARK-4421] Wrong link in spark-standalone.html
@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, so I'm going to merge this into master and branch-1.2. Thanks for the fix (and sorry for the big delay in review)!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2014
Modified the link of building Spark.

Author: Masayoshi TSUZUKI <[email protected]>

Closes #3279 from tsudukim/feature/SPARK-4421 and squashes the following commits:

56e31c1 [Masayoshi TSUZUKI] Modified the link of building Spark.

(cherry picked from commit ddfc09c)
Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in ddfc09c Dec 5, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants