Skip to content

[branch-1.1][SPARK-3990] add a note on ALS usage #3190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

[branch-1.1][SPARK-3990] add a note on ALS usage #3190

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr mengxr commented Nov 10, 2014

Because we switched back to Kryo in #3187 , we need to leave a note about the workaround.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 3190 at commit 53725b0.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 3190 at commit 53725b0.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23161/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Nov 10, 2014

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 3190 at commit 53725b0.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 3190 at commit 53725b0.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23168/
Test FAILed.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 11, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 3190 at commit 53725b0.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 11, 2014

QA tests have finished for PR 3190 at commit 53725b0.

  • This patch fails unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23184/
Test FAILed.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @mengxr this failed python style tests

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Nov 11, 2014

@andrewor14 Sorry, I forgot to run lint-python. It should be fixed now. We can wait for Jenkins passes python style check.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 11, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 3190 at commit d4818f3.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mengxr commented Nov 11, 2014

Jenkins passed Python style check and this PR contains only doc changes. I've merged this into branch-1.1 to not block the release.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2014
@mengxr
[branch-1.1][SPARK-3990] add a note on ALS usage
b2cb357 
Because we switched back to Kryo in #3187 , we need to leave a note about the workaround.

Author: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>

Closes #3190 from mengxr/SPARK-3990-1.1 and squashes the following commits:

d4818f3 [Xiangrui Meng] fix python style
53725b0 [Xiangrui Meng] add a note about SPARK-3990
56ad70e [Xiangrui Meng] add a note about SPARK-3990
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 11, 2014

Tests timed out after a configured wait of 120m.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/23202/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr mengxr closed this Nov 11, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@mengxr @SparkQA @AmplabJenkins @andrewor14