Skip to content

[SQL][DOC][Minor] Spark SQL Hive now support dynamic partitioning #3127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

scwf
Copy link
Contributor

@scwf scwf commented Nov 6, 2014

No description provided.

@scwf scwf changed the title [SQL][Minor] Spark SQL Hive now support dynamic partitioning [SQL][DOC][Minor] Spark SQL Hive now support dynamic partitioning Nov 6, 2014
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 6, 2014

Test build #22976 has started for PR 3127 at commit e39a560.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 6, 2014

Test build #22976 has finished for PR 3127 at commit e39a560.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22976/
Test PASSed.

@scwf
Copy link
Contributor Author

scwf commented Nov 7, 2014

cc @marmbrus

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Nov 7, 2014

Thanks! Merged to master and 1.2

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2014
Author: wangfei <[email protected]>

Closes #3127 from scwf/patch-9 and squashes the following commits:

e39a560 [wangfei] now support dynamic partitioning

(cherry picked from commit 636d7bc)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 636d7bc Nov 7, 2014
@scwf scwf deleted the patch-9 branch November 8, 2014 00:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants