Skip to content

[SPARK-12250] [SQL] Allow users to define a UDAF without providing details of its inputSchema #10236

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yhuai
Copy link
Contributor

@yhuai yhuai commented Dec 10, 2015

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2015

Test build #47466 has finished for PR 10236 at commit e050d0a.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor Author

yhuai commented Dec 10, 2015

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2015

Test build #47476 has finished for PR 10236 at commit d42da71.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2015

Test build #47473 has finished for PR 10236 at commit d42da71.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 10, 2015

Test build #47526 has finished for PR 10236 at commit e303d4c.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@yhuai
Copy link
Contributor Author

yhuai commented Dec 10, 2015

The only change is to remove that require. I am merging it to master and branch 1.6.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in bc5f56a Dec 10, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2015
…ails of its inputSchema

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12250

Author: Yin Huai <[email protected]>

Closes #10236 from yhuai/SPARK-12250.

(cherry picked from commit bc5f56a)
Signed-off-by: Yin Huai <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants