Skip to content

Conversation

@Yangsx-1
Copy link
Contributor

Close #1734

git-hulk
git-hulk previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2024
torwig
torwig previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@torwig torwig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
Ideally, it would be great to add the test case for the filtering by IDLE time.

@Yangsx-1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yangsx-1 commented Jul 1, 2024

LGTM. Ideally, it would be great to add the test case for the filtering by IDLE time.

Will add it in another PR. :)

@PragmaTwice
Copy link
Member

After #2384, I think this command need to be refactored.

So it's better to review and merge #2384 before this PR.

@PragmaTwice
Copy link
Member

#2384 is merged, could you refactor this PR to avoid iterating the whole stream subkeys?

@Yangsx-1
Copy link
Contributor Author

#2384 is merged, could you refactor this PR to avoid iterating the whole stream subkeys?

Sure, will do it later.

@PragmaTwice PragmaTwice requested a review from torwig July 20, 2024 06:46
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@PragmaTwice PragmaTwice merged commit 68523ac into apache:unstable Jul 21, 2024
@Yangsx-1 Yangsx-1 deleted the xpending branch July 28, 2024 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support of the XPENDING command

4 participants