Skip to content

fix: local setup issues #576

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 25, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hsnice16
Copy link
Contributor

@hsnice16 hsnice16 commented Jun 23, 2025

Closes the discussion #555

Context:
I was facing multiple issues while doing the local setup of the projects, which I have mentioned in the discussion #555.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved version checks for Node.js and PNPM, with clear error messages if mismatched.
    • SSL certificate generation is now conditional and occurs after dependency installation.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 23, 2025

@hsnice16 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Antiwork Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The development script now enforces specific Node.js and PNPM versions by reading and comparing them before proceeding. If the versions do not match the required ones, the script exits with an error. SSL certificate generation is moved to occur only after successful version checks and dependency installation, and only if the certificate does not already exist.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
scripts/dev.sh Enforces Node.js and PNPM version checks; conditionally generates SSL certificate after checks.

Poem

A bunny checks the versions twice,
Node and PNPM must be precise!
If all aligns, dependencies grow,
Then SSL certs begin to show.
With careful hops, the script runs true—
Dev setup’s smooth for me and you!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd295e4 and 9d7b630.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/dev.sh (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • scripts/dev.sh
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cursor BugBot
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@binary-koan
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like you have a very old PNPM version - please try using 10.8.0 as specified in package.json

Screenshot 2025-06-24 at 00 21 04

Please check you're on Node 22 as well

Either of those might be related - I haven't seen these problems before 🤔

@ConstantTime
Copy link
Contributor

+1. Was facing similar issues in my other laptop with node version = 18. Upgrading the node version will do the job here.

@hsnice16 hsnice16 force-pushed the fix/local-setup-issues branch from 0a8db2d to 13ae364 Compare June 24, 2025 06:07
cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a8db2d and 13ae364.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .pnpm-version (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • scripts/dev.sh (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .pnpm-version
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cursor BugBot
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/dev.sh (1)

29-31: 👍 Conditional SSL generation moved to post-install

Running certificate generation only when missing—and after dependencies are in place—prevents needless rebuilds on every dev.sh invocation. Looks good.

Comment on lines +17 to 23
# Node.js version check
current_node_version=$(node -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
if [ "$current_node_version" != "$REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION" ]; then
echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required Node.js version is $REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION, but found $current_node_version.\033[0m"
echo "Please install the correct version using nvm or your preferred version manager."
exit 1
fi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

String equality check is too strict for patch updates

Using != against the full node -v output rejects harmless patch bumps (e.g. v22.14.1). A simple semver-aware comparison is safer.

If you want zero dependencies:

IFS=. read -r major minor _ <<<"${current_node_version#v}"
if [[ $major -ne 22 || $minor -lt 14 ]]; then
  # ...
fi

Or rely on semver (already in most dev boxes):

if ! semver -r "22.x" "$current_node_version"; then; fi

This prevents unnecessary blocking while still enforcing the major/minor track.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/dev.sh around lines 17 to 23, the current Node.js version check uses
strict string equality which blocks harmless patch updates. Replace the string
equality check with a semver-aware comparison by parsing the major and minor
version numbers from current_node_version and comparing them numerically to the
required major and minor versions. Alternatively, use a semver tool if available
to check version compatibility. This ensures only major or minor version
mismatches cause an error, allowing patch updates to pass.

scripts/dev.sh Outdated
fi

corepack enable
corepack prepare
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

corepack prepare does nothing without a target version

Without arguments Corepack silently exits, so the intended pnpm pin never happens. Point it at the version declared in .pnpm-version (added in this PR) and activate it in one go:

-corepack prepare
+corepack prepare "pnpm@$(cat .pnpm-version)" --activate

This guarantees every contributor ends up on the same pnpm binary that matches CI.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/dev.sh at line 26, the command 'corepack prepare' is used without
specifying a target version, causing it to silently exit and not pin the
intended pnpm version. Modify the command to include the version from the
.pnpm-version file by reading that version and passing it as an argument to
'corepack prepare', ensuring the correct pnpm version is activated for all
contributors.

scripts/dev.sh Outdated
Comment on lines 5 to 6
REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v22.14.0"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid scattering the single source of truth for the Node.js version

The version string is hard-coded here while most contributors will look for a .nvmrc or an engines.node entry in package.json. Divergence is almost guaranteed the next time Node is bumped.

-REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v22.14.0"
+# Prefer centralising the version in .nvmrc (already committed by convention)
+if [[ -f .nvmrc ]]; then
+  REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v$(cat .nvmrc)"
+else
+  REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v22.14.0" # fallback
+fi

This keeps the script in lock-step with common tooling (nvm, volta, asdf, CI images…).

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v22.14.0"
# Prefer centralising the version in .nvmrc (already committed by convention)
if [[ -f .nvmrc ]]; then
REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v$(cat .nvmrc)"
else
REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v22.14.0" # fallback
fi
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/dev.sh around lines 5 to 6, the Node.js version is hard-coded as a
string, which risks divergence from the version specified in .nvmrc or
package.json. Modify the script to dynamically read the Node.js version from the
.nvmrc file or the engines.node field in package.json instead of using a
hard-coded string, ensuring consistency with common tooling and reducing
maintenance overhead.

@hsnice16
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, the PNPM version was the issue. (I had already updated the node version)

@binary-koan I have updated the README to explicitly include that, have added the node version check in the dev.sh, and have also added the missing corepack prepare statement to use the packageManager from package.json.

Copy link
Collaborator

@binary-koan binary-koan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to know! Added some questions on the changes

.pnpm-version Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
10.8.0
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't a standard file naming convention is it? If it's not used by other tools I think it should be inline in the dev script

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I created this to refer it in the README.md.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And, I am also using it in the check for pnpm version in the dev script.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's misleading though because if you're used to .node-version, .ruby-version etc then it looks like it's meant to be read by a tool like nodenv or rbenv. Since I'd rather remove the line from the README anyway, let's hardcode this in dev.sh

Copy link
Contributor Author

@hsnice16 hsnice16 Jun 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. Done.

README.md Outdated
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ You'll need:

- [Docker](https://docs.docker.com/get-docker/)
- [Node.js](https://nodejs.org/en/download/) (see [`.node-version`](.node-version))
- [pnpm](https://pnpm.io/installation) (see [`.pnpm-version`](.pnpm-version))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Corepack means you don't need to install pnpm manually, doesn't it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. I mentioned this explicitly so the devs can install it before the dev script command. So, they do not face any issues whatsoever.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But we can decide if we want to remove it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove it to keep things simple, we want as much of setup to be automated as possible

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. Done.

scripts/dev.sh Outdated
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

set -e

REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v22.14.0"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should read this from .node-version - fewer places to change when we upgrade Node

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have made this change.

scripts/dev.sh Outdated
fi

corepack enable
corepack prepare
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This command seems to be deprecated. Does corepack enable not switch to the correct version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is. But earlier, I was facing an issue with the pnpm version (the reason for this PR :)), so I explicitly added this.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the pnpm version check is enough, enable is supposed to activate the correct version on its own (we can reconsider if more people run into the issue)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. I have reverted this change.

# Node.js version check
current_node_version=$(node -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
if [ "$current_node_version" != "$REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION" ]; then
echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required Node.js version is $REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION, but found $current_node_version.\033[0m"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea - how about adding a similar check for pnpm version below?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have added it.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
scripts/dev.sh (2)

18-24: Node version gate is still an exact-string compare (previously flagged)
String equality rejects harmless patch bumps such as v22.14.1. Please switch to a semver-aware check instead of a literal compare.

-current_node_version=$(node -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
-if [ "$current_node_version" != "$REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION" ]; then
-    echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required Node.js version is $REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION, but found $current_node_version.\033[0m"
+current_node_version=$(node -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
+IFS=. read -r cur_major cur_minor _ <<<"${current_node_version#v}"
+IFS=. read -r req_major req_minor _ <<<"${REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION#v}"
+if [[ $cur_major -ne $req_major || $cur_minor -lt $req_minor ]]; then
+    echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required Node.js ≥ $REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION, but found $current_node_version.\033[0m"

26-28: corepack prepare still invoked without a target version
Running corepack prepare bare is a no-op (it exits 0 and changes nothing). Pin to the version in .pnpm-version and activate in one shot, e.g.:

-corepack prepare
+corepack prepare "pnpm@${REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION}" --activate
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13ae364 and fd295e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/dev.sh (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cursor BugBot
🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/dev.sh (1)

38-41: Certificate generation race-condition
pnpm generate-ssl-certificates relies on pnpm; ensure it comes after the pnpm version gate (see comment above) to prevent failures when the wrong pnpm is on PATH.

Comment on lines +30 to +37
# PNPM version check
current_pnpm_version=$(pnpm -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
if [ "$current_pnpm_version" != "$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION" ]; then
echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required PNPM version is $REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION, but found $current_pnpm_version.\033[0m"
echo "Please install the correct version using: corepack prepare pnpm@$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION --activate"
exit 1
fi

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Exact match on pnpm version is brittle
As with Node, an equality test blocks patch-level updates. Use cut -d. or semver to allow 10.8.x.

-current_pnpm_version=$(pnpm -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
-if [ "$current_pnpm_version" != "$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION" ]; then
+current_pnpm_version=$(pnpm -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
+IFS=. read -r cur_major cur_minor _ <<<"$current_pnpm_version"
+IFS=. read -r req_major req_minor _ <<<"$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION"
+if [[ $cur_major -ne $req_major || $cur_minor -lt $req_minor ]]; then
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# PNPM version check
current_pnpm_version=$(pnpm -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
if [ "$current_pnpm_version" != "$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION" ]; then
echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required PNPM version is $REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION, but found $current_pnpm_version.\033[0m"
echo "Please install the correct version using: corepack prepare pnpm@$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION --activate"
exit 1
fi
# PNPM version check
current_pnpm_version=$(pnpm -v 2>/dev/null || echo "not found")
IFS=. read -r cur_major cur_minor _ <<<"$current_pnpm_version"
IFS=. read -r req_major req_minor _ <<<"$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION"
if [[ $cur_major -ne $req_major || $cur_minor -lt $req_minor ]]; then
echo -e "\033[31m✖ Required PNPM version is $REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION, but found $current_pnpm_version.\033[0m"
echo "Please install the correct version using: corepack prepare pnpm@$REQUIRED_PNPM_VERSION --activate"
exit 1
fi
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/dev.sh around lines 30 to 37, the current pnpm version check uses
exact string equality, which blocks patch-level updates. Modify the version
check to allow any patch version within the required minor version by parsing
the version strings with a tool like cut or semver. For example, extract the
major and minor parts of both current and required versions and compare those
instead of the full version string to permit patch updates.

cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Collaborator

@binary-koan binary-koan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for explaining, replied!

scripts/dev.sh Outdated
fi

corepack enable
corepack prepare
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the pnpm version check is enough, enable is supposed to activate the correct version on its own (we can reconsider if more people run into the issue)

README.md Outdated
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ You'll need:

- [Docker](https://docs.docker.com/get-docker/)
- [Node.js](https://nodejs.org/en/download/) (see [`.node-version`](.node-version))
- [pnpm](https://pnpm.io/installation) (see [`.pnpm-version`](.pnpm-version))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove it to keep things simple, we want as much of setup to be automated as possible

.pnpm-version Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
10.8.0
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's misleading though because if you're used to .node-version, .ruby-version etc then it looks like it's meant to be read by a tool like nodenv or rbenv. Since I'd rather remove the line from the README anyway, let's hardcode this in dev.sh

Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Node Version Check Fails with Missing or Prefixed Files

The dev.sh script's Node.js version check is flawed. If the .node-version file is missing, cat .node-version fails, causing REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION to be incorrectly set to "v". This leads to a misleading error message (e.g., "Required Node.js version is v, but found vX.Y.Z"). Additionally, if the .node-version file already contains a "v" prefix (e.g., "v20.0.0"), the script prepends another "v", resulting in "vv20.0.0" and causing the version comparison to fail.

scripts/dev.sh#L4-L5

helper/scripts/dev.sh

Lines 4 to 5 in 9d7b630

REQUIRED_NODE_VERSION="v$(cat .node-version)"

Fix in Cursor


Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Collaborator

@binary-koan binary-koan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@binary-koan binary-koan merged commit 357e306 into antiwork:main Jun 25, 2025
3 of 7 checks passed
binary-koan added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
Follow-up to #576 

On second thoughts, we don't need to be too prescriptive about the exact
Node version for people without a version manager. We can still match
exactly for pnpm since it's installed with corepack.
@hsnice16
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for merging it 👍

@hsnice16
Copy link
Contributor Author

By any chance, does this PR come in the @slavingia post? https://x.com/shl/status/1935719392630698461

@slavingia
Copy link
Collaborator

Nope sorry!

hbce pushed a commit to hbce/helper that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
Closes the discussion antiwork#555 

**Context:**
I was facing multiple issues while doing the local setup of the
projects, which I have mentioned in the discussion antiwork#555.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Chores**
- Improved version checks for Node.js and PNPM, with clear error
messages if mismatched.
- SSL certificate generation is now conditional and occurs after
dependency installation.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
hbce pushed a commit to hbce/helper that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2025
Follow-up to antiwork#576 

On second thoughts, we don't need to be too prescriptive about the exact
Node version for people without a version manager. We can still match
exactly for pnpm since it's installed with corepack.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants