Skip to content

goshs has ACL Bypass & Path Traversal

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 27, 2026 in goshs-labs/goshs • Updated Jul 28, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/patrickhener/goshs (Go)

Affected versions

<= 1.1.4

Patched versions

None
gomod github.com/patrickhener/goshs/v2 (Go)
<= 2.1.4
2.1.5-0.20260727065949-f3ef599e4091
gomod goshs.de/goshs (Go)
<= 1.1.4
None
gomod goshs.de/goshs/v2 (Go)
<= 2.1.4
2.1.5-0.20260727065949-f3ef599e4091

Description

Summary

sendFile derives the served filename from the raw request path while opening the file from the cleaned path, so appending a trailing slash empties the derived name and defeats both the never-serve rule for the ACL file and the block list.

Finding (Medium): trailing-slash ACL and hidden-file bypass

httpserver/handler.go, sendFile (lines 789-801) takes the filename from the RAW req.URL.Path while the file itself is opened from the filepath.Clean-ed path. The two disagree, and a trailing slash makes the derived name the empty string. Both protections key on that derived name, so both are defeated: the rule that never serves the .goshs ACL file, and the acl.Block list.

Measured, with negative controls:

GET /blocked/secret.txt    -> 404          (control, correctly blocked)
GET /blocked/secret.txt/   -> 200 + contents
GET /blocked/.goshs/       -> 200, returns the ACL file itself,
                              including the admin:$2a$... bcrypt hash

Unauthenticated when the ACL is configured block-only (common usage). Stated precisely: AUTHENTICATION IS NOT BYPASSED. An unauthenticated request against a directory protected by authentication still returns 401 under the same trick; I tested that. The claim is specifically that the block list and the ACL-file protection are bypassed. In-tree evidence that sendFile is the defect: the sibling handlers doDir and bulkDownload both derive the name correctly; sendFile is the lone outlier.

Suggested fixes

  1. Derive the served filename from the same cleaned path used to open the file, so the authorization decision and the file access cannot disagree.

Tooling

AI assistance was used while investigating. The finding was reproduced against a running server on loopback with negative controls, including the 404-versus-200 pair and the authenticated-directory control that shows authentication is not affected.

References

@patrickhener patrickhener published to goshs-labs/goshs Jul 27, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 28, 2026
Reviewed Jul 28, 2026
Last updated Jul 28, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(23rd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence

The product is vulnerable to file system contents disclosure through path equivalence. Path equivalence involves the use of special characters in file and directory names. The associated manipulations are intended to generate multiple names for the same object. Learn more on MITRE.

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-66064

GHSA ID

GHSA-964w-f6gj-5236

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.