Skip to content

rclone: S3 Redirect Sanitization Omits IBM IAM Bearer Tokens and SSE-C Keys

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 31, 2026 in rclone/rclone • Updated Aug 5, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/rclone/rclone (Go)

Affected versions

<= 1.74.0

Patched versions

1.75.0

Description

1. Summary

The S3 redirect callback strips X-Amz-Security-Token when a redirect changes scheme or host, but it does not strip IBM IAM bearer authorization or customer-provided encryption keys. Two independently validated paths remain:

  • a same-host HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect preserves Authorization: Bearer ... and exposes a reusable IBM IAM token to the plaintext network path;
  • a cross-origin redirect preserves SSE-C and copy-source SSE-C key headers.

The High rating is driven by the reusable IBM IAM bearer token. The SSE-C cross-origin disclosure is a secondary confidentiality issue. The meaningful threat is a trusted endpoint, gateway, or accelerator that emits an unsafe redirect, followed by an adjacent/on-path observer; describing the originally configured endpoint itself as the attacker would be weak because that endpoint already receives the request secrets.

2. Affected Assets & Attack Surface

  • S3 redirect policy: backend/s3/s3.go:1345-1379
  • IBM IAM signer: backend/s3/ibm_signer.go:28-40
  • SSE-C key preparation: backend/s3/s3.go:1821-1837
  • Affected operations: requests carrying IBM IAM authorization, SSE-C keys, or copy-source SSE-C keys
  • Confirmed affected version: <= v1.74.0-240-ga0c09f138

3. Technical Root Cause Analysis

s3CheckRedirect applies a one-header denylist:

if s3RedirectCrossesHost(req, via) {
    req.Header.Del("X-Amz-Security-Token")
}

Go removes Authorization on some hostname changes, but preserves it for a same-host redirect and does not treat a scheme downgrade as sufficient reason to remove it. Go also has no generic knowledge that the SSE-C headers contain raw encryption keys. The rclone callback recognizes the STS token but not these additional origin-bound secrets.

4. Proof-of-Concept & Evidence

Using the actual redirect callback:

  1. An HTTPS endpoint redirected to HTTP on the same hostname.
  2. The plaintext destination received the planted IBM bearer token and SSE-C headers.
  3. A separate redirect to an unrelated hostname caused Go to remove Authorization, but the destination still received both SSE-C key headers.
  4. In both cases, rclone removed the planted STS token, proving that the S3-specific callback executed while omitting the other secret classes.

The related GHSA-gx4c-2hqx-cw2r covers the STS downgrade path and confirms that rclone treats scheme changes as a credential boundary. It does not cover the IBM bearer or SSE-C variants retained here.

5. Impact Assessment

A captured IBM bearer token can authorize reads, writes, and deletes within its IAM scope. A disclosed SSE-C key can expose corresponding ciphertext available to the recipient; copy-source keys can expose protected source objects. The exact impact is limited by token policy and the attacker's access to encrypted objects.

6. Remediation Guidance

  • Reject every HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect before replay.
  • Do not automatically follow secret-bearing cross-origin redirects.
  • On any scheme, host, or effective-port change, remove all authorization, cookies, session tokens, SSE-C fields, copy-source SSE-C fields, and provider-specific credentials.
  • Where redirects are required, allowlist exact destinations and reconstruct/re-sign a new request.
  • Add redirect tests for every secret header class and for scheme, hostname, subdomain, and port changes.

References

@ncw ncw published to rclone/rclone Jul 31, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 5, 2026
Reviewed Aug 5, 2026
Last updated Aug 5, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Learn more on MITRE.

Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information

The product transmits sensitive or security-critical data in cleartext in a communication channel that can be sniffed by unauthorized actors. Learn more on MITRE.

Insufficiently Protected Credentials

The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-8mxv-9xhp-86h4

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.