Skip to content

NCalc: Denial of Service via Unbounded and Non-Terminating Factorial Evaluation

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 17, 2026 in ncalc/ncalc • Updated Jun 18, 2026

Package

nuget NCalc.Core (NuGet)

Affected versions

< 6.1.1

Patched versions

6.1.1
nuget NCalcSync (NuGet)
< 6.1.1
6.1.1

Description

Impact

A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the factorial operator implementation of NCalc. Specially crafted expressions containing extremely large factorial operands can trigger excessive CPU consumption or cause evaluation to enter a non-terminating loop due to integer overflow in the factorial calculation logic.

Applications that evaluate untrusted expressions using affected versions of NCalc may be vulnerable to resource exhaustion, potentially resulting in service disruption or application unresponsiveness.

This issue can be triggered with expressions such as:

99999999999999!
9223372036854775807!
1.5e16!

Patches

The vulnerability has been fixed by adding bounds validation for factorial operands and rejecting unsupported values before evaluation.

Users should upgrade to the first release containing the fix from pull request #575. (v6.1.1+)

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible:

  • Do not evaluate expressions originating from untrusted users.
  • Validate or sanitize expressions before evaluation and reject factorial operations on large values.
  • Implement execution time limits, request timeouts, or cancellation mechanisms around expression evaluation.

These mitigations may reduce exposure but do not fully address the underlying vulnerability.

References

@gumbarros gumbarros published to ncalc/ncalc Jun 17, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 18, 2026
Reviewed Jun 18, 2026
Last updated Jun 18, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(8th percentile)

Weaknesses

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number. Learn more on MITRE.

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55254

GHSA ID

GHSA-3w5p-95mh-gq75

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.