-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
feat: add ember-vite example #108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Claude finished @Nsttt's task —— View job PR Review Complete ✅I've conducted a thorough code review of the ember-vite example addition and provided comprehensive feedback. Completed Tasks:
Review SummaryOverall Quality Score: 6/10 Key Findings:
Priority Actions:
The PR provides a solid foundation for an Ember-Vite example but needs test coverage and stability improvements before being production-ready. I've added specific inline comments and recommendations throughout the codebase. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comprehensive Code Review: Ember-Vite Example
Purpose Summary: This PR adds a complete Ember.js application example configured to use Vite as the build tool, demonstrating modern Ember development with Vite integration.
Detailed Review Analysis
Review Summary Table
Severity | Line(s) | Issue | Recommendation |
---|---|---|---|
High | package.json:56,65 | Beta versions in dependencies | Use stable releases for ember-cli and ember-source |
Critical | tests/ directory | Missing test files | Add sample integration and unit tests |
Medium | package.json:5-8 | Missing metadata | Complete description, repository, author fields |
Medium | README.md:43 | Incorrect build command | Update build commands for Vite workflow |
Medium | environment.js:43 | Empty production config | Add security headers and production optimizations |
Low | vite.config.mjs:10 | Unclear comment | Remove or improve plugin comment |
Low | application.gjs:5 | Hardcoded app title | Use descriptive or configurable title |
Security Analysis
- ✅ No direct security vulnerabilities found in code
⚠️ Beta versions could introduce unknown security issues⚠️ Missing CSP and security headers configuration- ✅ Dependencies appear legitimate and from trusted sources
- ✅ No secrets or sensitive data exposed
Performance Considerations
- ✅ Vite configuration is appropriate for fast development
- ✅ Modern ES modules and tree-shaking enabled
- ✅ Babel configuration optimized for runtime transforms
- ✅ Proper asset handling through Embroider/Vite integration
Code Quality Assessment
- ✅ ESLint configuration is comprehensive with modern standards
- ✅ Prettier and Stylelint properly configured
- ✅ Modern Ember patterns (GJS templates, Octane edition)
⚠️ Missing actual implementation examples beyond welcome page⚠️ No demonstration of Ember features (components, services, routes)
Test Coverage Analysis
- ❌ Critical Gap: No actual test files present
- ✅ Test infrastructure properly configured (QUnit, ember-qunit)
- ✅ Test helper setup is correct
- ❌ Missing integration tests for key functionality
- ❌ No unit tests for components or services
Architecture & Design
- ✅ Proper Embroider/Vite integration
- ✅ Modern Ember application structure
- ✅ Appropriate separation of concerns
- ✅ Configuration files well-organized
⚠️ Could benefit from more example components/features
Concrete Fixes
For package.json stability:
{
"ember-cli": "~6.4.0",
"ember-source": "~6.4.0"
}
For production security (environment.js):
if (environment === 'production') {
ENV.APP.rootURL = '/ember-vite/'; // if needed for deployment
// Add security configurations
ENV.contentSecurityPolicy = {
'default-src': "'self'",
'script-src': "'self'",
'style-src': "'self' 'unsafe-inline'"
};
}
Sample test file (tests/integration/components/application-test.js):
import { module, test } from 'qunit';
import { setupRenderingTest } from 'ember-qunit';
import { render } from '@ember/test-helpers';
import { hbs } from 'ember-cli-htmlbars';
module('Integration | Component | application', function (hooks) {
setupRenderingTest(hooks);
test('it renders welcome page', async function (assert) {
await render(hbs`<WelcomePage />`);
assert.dom('[data-test-welcome]').exists();
});
});
Overall Quality Score: 6/10
Scoring Breakdown:
- Setup & Configuration: 8/10 (excellent Vite integration)
- Code Quality: 7/10 (good patterns, needs more examples)
- Security: 5/10 (beta deps, missing security config)
- Test Coverage: 2/10 (infrastructure only, no tests)
- Documentation: 6/10 (good structure, some inaccuracies)
- Best Practices: 7/10 (modern patterns, some gaps)
Top 3 Next Steps:
- Add comprehensive test coverage - Create sample integration and unit tests to demonstrate testing with Vite
- Stabilize dependencies - Replace beta versions with stable releases for production readiness
- Enhance example content - Add more Ember components and features to better demonstrate the framework capabilities
This is a solid foundation for an Ember-Vite example, but addressing the test coverage and stability issues would significantly improve its value as a reference implementation.
"concurrently": "^9.1.2", | ||
"decorator-transforms": "^2.3.0", | ||
"ember-auto-import": "^2.10.0", | ||
"ember-cli": "~6.5.0-beta.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
High Priority - Security: Using beta versions in production examples could introduce instability and security vulnerabilities. Consider using stable versions for ember-cli
(currently ~6.5.0-beta.0) and ember-source
(currently ~6.5.0-beta.1).
"name": "ember-vite", | ||
"version": "0.0.0", | ||
"private": true, | ||
"description": "Small description for ember-vite goes here", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Medium Priority - Metadata: The package.json is missing important metadata fields like description
, repository
, and author
. For an example project in a public repository, these should be properly filled out to demonstrate best practices.
|
||
### Building | ||
|
||
- `npm exec ember build` (development) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Medium Priority - Documentation: The build command shown here is incorrect for the Vite setup. Line 43 shows npm exec ember build
which doesn't align with the Vite configuration. Should use npm run build
for production builds as shown in line 44, or update the development build command to match the Vite workflow.
plugins: [ | ||
classicEmberSupport(), | ||
ember(), | ||
// extra plugins here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Low Priority - Code Quality: The comment "extra plugins here" should either be removed if no additional plugins are intended, or replaced with a more descriptive comment about what types of plugins might be added here for customization.
import { WelcomePage } from 'ember-welcome-page'; | ||
|
||
<template> | ||
{{pageTitle "MyApp"}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Low Priority - Best Practice: The pageTitle
is hardcoded as "MyApp". For an example project, this should either be more descriptive (e.g., "Ember Vite Example") or demonstrate how to make it configurable through environment variables or configuration.
ENV.APP.autoboot = false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (environment === 'production') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Medium Priority - Security: Consider adding basic security headers configuration for production environment. The current production configuration is empty but should include security best practices like CSP headers, HSTS, etc., especially for an example that others might use as a template.
No description provided.