Skip to content

Renaming Goal to GoalSignal #5190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

vincentpierre
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change(s)

Renamed the ObservationType GOAL to GOAL_SIGNAL
Removed the proto observation types that were unused.

Useful links (Github issues, JIRA tickets, ML-Agents forum threads etc.)

Types of change(s)

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Code refactor
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe)

Checklist

  • Added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Updated the changelog (if applicable)
  • Updated the documentation (if applicable)
  • Updated the migration guide (if applicable)

Other comments

@vincentpierre vincentpierre self-assigned this Mar 26, 2021
@vincentpierre vincentpierre merged commit 82e20b7 into goal-conditioning-sensors-3 Mar 26, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the goal-conditioning-sensors-rename-goal branch March 26, 2021 01:37
vincentpierre added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2021
…5159)

* Fixing networks.py for the merge

* fix compile error

* Adding the goal conditioning sensors with the new observation specs

* addressing feedback

* I forgot to change the m_observationType

* Renaming Goal to GoalSignal (#5190)

* Renaming GOAL to GOAL_SIGNAL

* VectorSensorComponent to use new API

* Adding docstrings

* verbose pytest on github action

Co-authored-by: Chris Elion <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 26, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants