Skip to content

Fuzzing dates #929

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2022
Merged

Fuzzing dates #929

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2022

Conversation

SBOne-Kenobi
Copy link
Collaborator

@SBOne-Kenobi SBOne-Kenobi commented Sep 14, 2022

Description

Fuzzing generates bad initialized Dates by invalid date strings. Provided new simple fuzzing logic for dates.

Fixes #739

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Manual Scenario

Described in issue #739

Checklist:

  • The change followed the style guidelines of the UTBot project
  • Self-review of the code is passed
  • The change contains enough commentaries, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • New documentation is provided or existed one is altered
  • No new warnings
  • New tests have been added
  • All tests pass locally with my changes

@SBOne-Kenobi SBOne-Kenobi self-assigned this Sep 14, 2022
@SBOne-Kenobi SBOne-Kenobi enabled auto-merge (squash) September 14, 2022 18:27
@SBOne-Kenobi SBOne-Kenobi merged commit eb1bb8a into main Sep 15, 2022
@SBOne-Kenobi SBOne-Kenobi deleted the sbone/fuzzing-date branch September 15, 2022 05:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concrete execution fails when Fuzzing tries to initialize Date with String
2 participants