-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
fix(router-core): processRouteTree orders routes w/ prefix / suffix based on their lengths #4850
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Sheraff
merged 1 commit into
main
from
fix-router-core-process-tree-order-prefix-suffix-length
Aug 1, 2025
Merged
fix(router-core): processRouteTree orders routes w/ prefix / suffix based on their lengths #4850
Sheraff
merged 1 commit into
main
from
fix-router-core-process-tree-order-prefix-suffix-length
Aug 1, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ased on their lengths
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit a2bf373
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
More templates
@tanstack/arktype-adapter
@tanstack/directive-functions-plugin
@tanstack/eslint-plugin-router
@tanstack/history
@tanstack/react-router
@tanstack/react-router-devtools
@tanstack/react-router-with-query
@tanstack/react-start
@tanstack/react-start-client
@tanstack/react-start-plugin
@tanstack/react-start-server
@tanstack/router-cli
@tanstack/router-core
@tanstack/router-devtools
@tanstack/router-devtools-core
@tanstack/router-generator
@tanstack/router-plugin
@tanstack/router-utils
@tanstack/router-vite-plugin
@tanstack/server-functions-plugin
@tanstack/solid-router
@tanstack/solid-router-devtools
@tanstack/solid-start
@tanstack/solid-start-client
@tanstack/solid-start-plugin
@tanstack/solid-start-server
@tanstack/start-client-core
@tanstack/start-plugin-core
@tanstack/start-server-core
@tanstack/start-server-functions-client
@tanstack/start-server-functions-fetcher
@tanstack/start-server-functions-server
@tanstack/start-storage-context
@tanstack/valibot-adapter
@tanstack/virtual-file-routes
@tanstack/zod-adapter
commit: |
schiller-manuel
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When ordering routes to determine "which one will match in priority", we try to follow the "more specific 1st" principle.
Currently, 2 routes with the same pattern, but with prefixes of different lengths, are counted as having the same specificity, and thus are not re-ordered. For example:
/f{$param}
/foo{$param}
In this case, assuming
f{$param}.tsx
is returned 1st by the OS when listing route files (which it is by alphabetical order), a path/foobar
will match/f{$param}
.This PR proposes we take the
length
of theprefix
andsuffix
into account when sorting routes. In this example this would mean/foo{$param}
takes priority because it is considered more specific.