Skip to content

Conversation

@weiznich
Copy link
Contributor

During a dependency review we noticed that the xattr crate includes a ci script file. This file is not required for building xattr as depndency. The script file might at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the [bans.build.interpreted] option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.

@Stebalien
Copy link
Owner

SGTM but see Stebalien/tempfile#384.

During a dependency review we noticed that the xattr crate includes a ci script file. This file is not required for building xattr as depndency. The script file might at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the `[bans.build.interpreted]` option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.
@Stebalien Stebalien merged commit 6940b56 into Stebalien:master Dec 16, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants