Skip to content

Model response timeout #995

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025
Merged

Model response timeout #995

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

hchen2020
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@GGHansome
Copy link

Auto Review Result:

Code Review Summary

Change Overview: The submitted code introduces new functionalities, including cache clearing to rebuild agent instructions, handling of DTMF (Dual-Tone Multi-Frequency) events, and a mechanism to handle model response timeouts. These changes aim to enhance the system's responsiveness and reliability by managing real-time connections and interactions more efficiently.

Issues Identified

Issue 1: [Code Maintainability]

  • Description: The newly added sections in the code are sparsely commented. Critical operations like Utilities.ClearCache() and the timeout logic should have comments explaining their purpose and implications to improve maintainability and ease of understanding for future developers.
  • Suggestion: Add detailed comments above these sections to clarify the logic and purpose.
  • Example:
    // Clear cache to ensure the latest agent instructions are used
    Utilities.ClearCache();
    ...
    // Handle model response timeout to trigger an immediate user response
    var timeout = 30;
    var taskTimer = Task.Delay(1000 * timeout);
    ...

Issue 2: [Error Handling]

  • Description: In the method handling server error responses, the logic breaks from the loop break; upon encountering a server_error. Such abrupt exits could potentially lead to unreleased resources or incomplete transactions.
  • Suggestion: Ensure resources are released properly and any necessary cleanup logic is enforced before breaking out of the loop.
  • Example:
    if (error?.Body.Type == "server_error")
    {
        CleanupResources();
        break;
    }

Issue 3: [Code Clarity]

  • Description: There seems to be leftover commented-out code (/* */ block relating to a "dtmf" event), which might indicate incomplete functionality or unused code.
  • Suggestion: Remove or address unfinished features documented in comments to avoid confusion.
  • Example:
    // Consider uncommenting or removing when the feature is completed or deprecated.
    /*
    if (response.Event == "dtmf")
    {
        // Send a Stop command to Twilio
        ...
    }
    */

Overall Assessment

The code changes present potentially useful features that could increase the robustness of the application. However, clarity and maintainability are compromised by insufficient documentation and the presence of potentially incomplete or unused code. It is recommended to focus on enhancing clarity and ensuring that all implemented features are fully integrated and documented.

@Oceania2018 Oceania2018 merged commit f1fe571 into SciSharp:master Apr 4, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants