Skip to content

[Ignore] Update dotnet SDK to 3.0.100 #1095

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rjmholt
Copy link
Contributor

@rjmholt rjmholt commented Nov 7, 2019

Current version on https://dot.net. Need it to build in Visual Studio.

@TylerLeonhardt
Copy link
Member

yikes!

@bergmeister
Copy link
Contributor

Rob is using Visual Studio 🤭? What happened to vim? 🤣

@rjmholt
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjmholt commented Nov 16, 2019

Rob is using Visual Studio 🤭

For some reason the C# extension in VSCode really doesn't like PSES, and vim just isn't practical for C#, just like it wasn't for Java. I used to use vim flawlessly with JS, Python, etc., but C#/Java are just too verbose. Also vim isn't great in the old school Windows console; hoping that will improve in the new terminal. If it were practical for me to use Ubuntu as a daily driver still, I'd have more vim emphasis.

@TylerLeonhardt
Copy link
Member

@rjmholt ehem https://github.com/coc-extensions/coc-omnisharp 😎

@corbob
Copy link
Contributor

corbob commented Nov 18, 2019

@rjmholt ehem https://github.com/coc-extensions/coc-omnisharp 😎

I mean if you're using neovim, perhaps you can just get it working??? https://twitter.com/Neovim/status/1194879302887559168

@rjmholt
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjmholt commented Nov 19, 2019

Closing in favour of the other one that took us to 2.1.802

@rjmholt rjmholt closed this Nov 19, 2019
@rjmholt rjmholt deleted the dotnet-sdk-update branch December 11, 2019 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants