This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
schaefer atlas network order #236
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Description
Ref #222, #223
Describe the bug
In ThomasYeoLab/CBIG#2 I proposed a mapping between the network numbers and network names based on the RGB components provided and was confirmed by @rubykong.
{
"17Networks_1": "VisCent",
"17Networks_2": "VisPeri",
"17Networks_3": "SomMotA",
"17Networks_4": "SomMotB",
"17Networks_5": "DorsAttnA",
"17Networks_6": "DorsAttnB",
"17Networks_7": "SalVentAttnA",
"17Networks_8": "SalVentAttnB",
"17Networks_9": "Limbic",
"17Networks_10": "Limbic",
"17Networks_11": "ContC",
"17Networks_12": "ContA",
"17Networks_13": "ContB",
"17Networks_14": "TempPar",
"17Networks_15": "DefaultC",
"17Networks_16": "DefaultA",
"17Networks_17": "DefaultB"
}
Looking at the community numbers and the community names, the A,B,C networks should be listed in the order C,A,B, as well as some other flips.
So under my proposed mapping, the order of communities names should be:
visualCentral -> visualCentral (unchanged)
visualPeripheral -> visualPeripheral (unchanged)
somatomotorA -> somatomotorA (unchanged)
somatomotorBAuditory -> somatomotorBAuditory (unchanged)
dorsalAttentionA -> dorsalAttentionA (unchanged)
dorsalAttentionB -> dorsalAttentionB (unchanged)
salienceVentralAttentionA -> salienceVentralAttentionA (unchanged)
salienceVentralAttentionB -> salienceVentralAttentionB (unchanged)
limbicOrbitofrontal -> limbicTemporopolar
limbicTemporopolar -> limbicOrbitofrontal
frontoparietalControlA -> frontoparietalControlC
frontoparietalControlB -> frontoparietalControlA
frontoparietalControlC -> frontoparietalControlB
defaultA -> temporoparietal
defaultB -> defaultC
defaultC -> defaultA
temporoparietal -> defaultB
@rubykong - could you please check to see if me proposed mapping from network number to name is correct, and if it is the same for Buckner, Choi, and yeo?
This is causing me confusion as well, so it will be helpful to get to the bottom of this.
thanks all!
-cc @tientong98
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels