Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

schaefer atlas network order #236

@jdkent

Description

@jdkent

Ref #222, #223
Describe the bug
In ThomasYeoLab/CBIG#2 I proposed a mapping between the network numbers and network names based on the RGB components provided and was confirmed by @rubykong.

{
    "17Networks_1": "VisCent",
    "17Networks_2": "VisPeri",
    "17Networks_3": "SomMotA",
    "17Networks_4": "SomMotB",
    "17Networks_5": "DorsAttnA",
    "17Networks_6": "DorsAttnB",
    "17Networks_7": "SalVentAttnA",
    "17Networks_8": "SalVentAttnB",
    "17Networks_9": "Limbic",
    "17Networks_10": "Limbic",
    "17Networks_11": "ContC",
    "17Networks_12": "ContA",
    "17Networks_13": "ContB",
    "17Networks_14": "TempPar",
    "17Networks_15": "DefaultC",
    "17Networks_16": "DefaultA",
    "17Networks_17": "DefaultB"

}

Looking at the community numbers and the community names, the A,B,C networks should be listed in the order C,A,B, as well as some other flips.

So under my proposed mapping, the order of communities names should be:

visualCentral -> visualCentral (unchanged)
visualPeripheral -> visualPeripheral (unchanged)
somatomotorA -> somatomotorA (unchanged)
somatomotorBAuditory -> somatomotorBAuditory (unchanged)
dorsalAttentionA -> dorsalAttentionA (unchanged)
dorsalAttentionB -> dorsalAttentionB (unchanged)
salienceVentralAttentionA -> salienceVentralAttentionA (unchanged)
salienceVentralAttentionB -> salienceVentralAttentionB (unchanged)
limbicOrbitofrontal ->  limbicTemporopolar
limbicTemporopolar -> limbicOrbitofrontal
frontoparietalControlA -> frontoparietalControlC
frontoparietalControlB -> frontoparietalControlA
frontoparietalControlC -> frontoparietalControlB
defaultA -> temporoparietal
defaultB -> defaultC
defaultC -> defaultA
temporoparietal -> defaultB

@rubykong - could you please check to see if me proposed mapping from network number to name is correct, and if it is the same for Buckner, Choi, and yeo?

This is causing me confusion as well, so it will be helpful to get to the bottom of this.
thanks all!

-cc @tientong98

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions