Skip to content

Conversation

@tbensonatl
Copy link
Collaborator

FFT no longer implicitly zero-pads input signals, so pass the expected transform length explicitly.

FFT no longer implicitly zero-pads input signals, so pass the
expected transform length explicitly.
@tbensonatl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/blossom-ci

@tbensonatl tbensonatl merged commit 875d742 into main Oct 6, 2023
@tbensonatl tbensonatl deleted the add-explicit-fft-padding-fft-conv-example branch October 6, 2023 20:06
cliffburdick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2023
FFT no longer implicitly zero-pads input signals, so pass the
expected transform length explicitly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants