update readme

[helloyongyang]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @helloyongyang, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the accuracy of the project's documentation by revising the performance benchmark tables in both the English and Chinese README files. The changes specifically address the single-card configuration, providing updated and corrected metrics for certain frameworks to ensure users have the most current and precise performance information.

Highlights

• Performance Metrics Update: Updated the 'Step Time' and 'Speedup' values for 'FastVideo' and 'SGL-Diffusion' in the 1-card configuration within the performance benchmark tables.
• Table Reordering: Adjusted the order of entries for 'FastVideo' and 'xDiT' in the 1-card performance benchmark tables for better presentation.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the benchmark data in the README.md and README_zh.md files. The changes appear to correct the performance metrics for FastVideo and SGL-Diffusion. I've added a suggestion to reorder the rows in the benchmark table for consistency and better readability, ensuring it's sorted by performance like the other tables in the document.

[gemini-code-assist]

Thanks for updating the benchmark data. To maintain consistency with the other performance tables (like the H100 benchmark), it would be clearer to sort the rows by performance, from slowest to fastest (Step Time descending), with 'OOM' results at the end. Currently, LightX2V is at the bottom of the 1-card group, but it's the fastest in this category.

Suggested change

	| xDiT | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| FastVideo | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| SGL-Diffusion | 1 | 22.66s/it | 1.3x |
	| SGL-Diffusion | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| **LightX2V** | 1 | **20.26s/it** | **1.5x** 🚀 |
	| **LightX2V** | 1 | **20.26s/it** | **1.5x** 🚀 |
	| xDiT | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| SGL-Diffusion | 1 | OOM | OOM |

[gemini-code-assist]

Thanks for updating the benchmark data. To maintain consistency with the other performance tables (like the H100 benchmark), it would be clearer to sort the rows by performance, from slowest to fastest (Step Time descending), with 'OOM' results at the end. Currently, LightX2V is at the bottom of the 1-card group, but it's the fastest in this category.

Suggested change

	| xDiT | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| FastVideo | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| SGL-Diffusion | 1 | 22.66s/it | 1.3x |
	| SGL-Diffusion | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| **LightX2V** | 1 | **20.26s/it** | **1.5x** 🚀 |
	| **LightX2V** | 1 | **20.26s/it** | **1.5x** 🚀 |
	| xDiT | 1 | OOM | OOM |
	| SGL-Diffusion | 1 | OOM | OOM |