Skip to content

Follow-up fix for semantic segmentation example #881

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
williamFalcon merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2020
Merged

Follow-up fix for semantic segmentation example #881

williamFalcon merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2020

Conversation

@akshaykulkarni07
Copy link
Contributor

@akshaykulkarni07 akshaykulkarni07 commented Feb 17, 2020

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue? (no need for typos, doc improvements)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline?
  • Did you make sure to update the docs?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?
  • If you made a notable change (that affects users), did you update the CHANGELOG?

What does this PR do?

Fixes #876 (previous PR).

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.

Made the changes suggested by @Borda in the last PR (#876).

@williamFalcon williamFalcon merged commit 0ad3e8b into Lightning-AI:master Feb 17, 2020
@Borda Borda added the feature Is an improvement or enhancement label Mar 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Borda Borda Awaiting requested review from Borda

@williamFalcon williamFalcon Awaiting requested review from williamFalcon

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

feature Is an improvement or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@akshaykulkarni07 @williamFalcon @Borda