Skip to content

Conversation

pierremtb
Copy link
Contributor

@pierremtb pierremtb commented Aug 27, 2025

What I ran to get there.

  52        2.468 git revert e7626e9f3da5b2246b317d65fcc6e0eca425d212
  53        2.412 git revert 199d5a36477228cdb60982de6d4aa1a5f2ae198d
  54        0.121 git revert 5c1a41796b001d73e70015efedb085b0b1fae55e
  55        3.606 git revert 49d40f28b703505743f90948a38ede929d4f28e0
  56        0.116 git revert e42e5f8ec3a381fe9f52f7039340e959a2442940
  57        2.975 git revert f7fc3b25ada00961c857e0f31e9ca6bd9ad02fa2
  58        0.225 git revert c699bb0a387a8b1c15fb64145bf5ee6a990c1499
  59        0.329 git checkout -b pierremtb/experiment-revert-ttc-phase-ux

then fix a tsc error in a test file 2d14608

We would then want to create a dev branch, eg. conversational-ttc and bring those commits back there

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 27, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
modeling-app Ready Ready Preview Comment Aug 27, 2025 4:22pm

@pierremtb pierremtb changed the title Pierremtb/experiment revert ttc phase ux Experiment: revert TTC Conversational UX commits from main Aug 27, 2025
@pierremtb pierremtb marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2025 17:36
@pierremtb pierremtb requested a review from a team as a code owner August 27, 2025 17:36
@pierremtb pierremtb changed the title Experiment: revert TTC Conversational UX commits from main Revert TTC Conversational UX commits Aug 27, 2025
@pierremtb pierremtb requested a review from greg-kcio August 27, 2025 17:41
@pierremtb pierremtb merged commit 42f1265 into main Aug 27, 2025
56 checks passed
@pierremtb pierremtb deleted the pierremtb/experiment-revert-ttc-phase-ux branch August 27, 2025 19:45
pierremtb added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants