Skip to content

Conversation

topolarity
Copy link
Member

Without the where clause, this can end up inferred / invoked as e.g. eigencopy_oftype(::Symmetric{ComplexF64, ...}, ::Type)::Matrix (eltype is lost)

As-is this can end up inferred as e.g.
`eigencopy_oftype(::Symmetric{ComplexF64, ...}, ::Type)::Matrix`
(eltype was lost)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.87%. Comparing base (37c86b8) to head (850b9a2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1419   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.87%   93.87%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines       15852    15857    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        14881    14886    +5     
  Misses        971      971           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jishnub jishnub merged commit cdd135e into master Aug 21, 2025
4 checks passed
@jishnub jishnub deleted the ct/trim-eigencopy branch August 21, 2025 01:20
@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

@dkarrasch Is it simplest to just cherry pick this directly onto the release-1.12 branch, or should we do the backports?

@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Usually one would want to run a CI check before merging/cherry-picking into a release branch, but this is simple enough to be cherry-picked directly, I think.

dkarrasch pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2025
Without the `where` clause, this can end up inferred / invoked as e.g.
`eigencopy_oftype(::Symmetric{ComplexF64, ...}, ::Type)::Matrix` (eltype
is lost)
@dkarrasch dkarrasch mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2025
2 tasks
dkarrasch added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2025
@dkarrasch dkarrasch removed the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label Aug 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants