Skip to content

Adjoint not defined on AbstractThunk #224

@oxinabox

Description

@oxinabox

It would be useful to define adjoint on thunks.
Some rules call adjoint internally, .e.g. Cholesky,
and defining adjoint would make it possible to call them without having to unthunk first.

adjoint is a linear operator so it should be fine to define.

Would be useful for invenia/Nabla.jl#189
(came up in the tests for Cholesky)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    LinearOperatorsFor issues relating to defining linear operators on AbstractDifferentials

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions