Request for an active maintainer

[akirataguchi115]

As the project has no active maintainer anymore, could you propose us a new one, @brettz9 ? JSONPath is a very important topic especially now that IETF is crafting the official standard for this. JSONPath-Plus is the second most active JSONPath tool in the world and the best tool for JavaScript right now. If there is no one I can definitely volunteer as the maintainer but only for this summer due to my university studies beginning in the fall.

https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/blob/55e77286407db43282b4e5bdd232fb424cce9f11/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md?plain=1#LL6C1-L9C4

---
<!--
**PLEASE NOTE: This project is not currently being very actively developed.**
-->

[brettz9]

If someone with a history of contributions elsewhere could make a significant PR contribution here, I'd be happy to review, and pass on the torch to that person. Note though that any such PRs should be consistent with the cross-project comparison effort (see #124 ).

[akirataguchi115]

Good point. I agree that the next person should be involved in the cross-project comparison. To get more awareness for the next maintainer, could we pin this? Do you have some suggestions for an alternative title or is the current title descriptive enough?

[brettz9]

I think it's fine as is. Pinned.

[vid]

Hi all, I can offer to act as maintainer in terms of merging requests, following repo standards and trying to make things more clear, but I couldn't follow the developing jsonpath standards or make any promises about improving the repo code.

[brettz9]

Hi all, I can offer to act as maintainer in terms of merging requests, following repo standards and trying to make things more clear, but I couldn't follow the developing jsonpath standards or make any promises about improving the repo code.

Thank you for the offer. I think I can manage the merging of requests at this point, but would welcome PRs to make things more clear as in other areas.

[80avin]

A little announcement that I have joined this project as a maintainer now.

In the coming days, I will be working on implementing the IETF standard mentioned in #205 while retaining the path syntax supported by JSONPath-Plus.

This will also help in fixing many issues with the path parsing like #225 , #203 , #187 , etc.