Skip to content

implement dpnp.positive #1559

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 29, 2023
Merged

implement dpnp.positive #1559

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 29, 2023

Conversation

vtavana
Copy link
Collaborator

@vtavana vtavana commented Sep 17, 2023

In this PR, dpnp.positive is implemented using its counterpart in dpctl, i.e., dpctl.tensor.positive.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

@vtavana vtavana self-assigned this Sep 17, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2023

View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/index.html

@vtavana vtavana marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2023 20:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@vlad-perevezentsev vlad-perevezentsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
thanks @vtavana

@vtavana vtavana merged commit 66f26c4 into master Sep 29, 2023
@vtavana vtavana deleted the positive_dpctl_to_dpnp branch September 29, 2023 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants