site[s]
convenient constructors for unit ranges/axes
#21
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For example,
site("S=1/2")
is now a shorthand forAbstractUnitRange(SiteType("S=1/2"))
, andsites("S=1/2", 4)
is a shorthand for[AbstractUnitRange(SiteType("S=1/2")) for _ in 1:4]
. These are generalizations ofsiteind
andsiteinds
defined in ITensors.jl/ITensorMPS.jl.Additionally, a unit range type can be passed as the first argument for customization, i.e.:
The idea is that the next generation versions of
siteind
andsiteinds
(being developed in ITensor/ITensorMPS.jl#108) can just be defined as:where customizations like symmetry sectors and Hilbert space dimensions (in the case of bosons/qudits) can be passed as keyword arguments.