This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 3, 2025. It is now read-only.
git: accept explicit commit hash for git context#1765
Merged
tejal29 merged 2 commits intoGoogleContainerTools:masterfrom Oct 20, 2021
Merged
git: accept explicit commit hash for git context#1765tejal29 merged 2 commits intoGoogleContainerTools:masterfrom
tejal29 merged 2 commits intoGoogleContainerTools:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
tejal29
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2021
wwade
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5314064 to
1061be9
Compare
Contributor
Author
Contributor
Author
|
I'm just going to fix the "Unit tests" failure also affecting "build-executor". |
When checking out code from non-github repositories, the typical
assumptions may not be valid, e.g. that the only interesting
non-branch commits have ref names starting with refs/pull. A specific
example is fetching an un-merged commit from a gerrit repository by
commit hash.
This change just looks at the second part of the git context path and
checks if it's a SHA commit hash, and if so, will fetch and check out
this commit after cloning the repository.
Sample context argument:
https://github.repo/project#e1772f228e06d15facdf175e5385e265b57068c0
hack/linter.sh didn't properly install golangci-lint in hack/bin as I
already have another version of golangci-lint on my PATH, but then it
failed to execute because it was looking for it specifically in
hack/bin.
When the executable is not found, the exit code is 127 instead of 1,
and so test.sh ignored the error.
Two fixes:
1. `test.sh`:
- Use `if (script) ...` instead of assigning / checking a result
variable to determine if each validation script passed or failed.
2. `hack/linter.sh`:
- Instead of checking for golangci-lint on the path, just
specifically check for an executable file (`test -x`) in the
expected location.
Contributor
Author
|
tejal29
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2021
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When checking out code from non-github repositories, the typical
assumptions may not be valid, e.g. that the only interesting
non-branch commits have ref names starting with refs/pull. A specific
example is fetching an un-merged commit from a gerrit repository by
commit hash.
This change just looks at the second part of the git context path and
checks if it's a SHA commit hash, and if so, will fetch and check out
this commit after cloning the repository.
Sample context argument:
Submitter Checklist
These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:
Reviewer Notes
Release Notes