Skip to content

Several fixes in the lazread function. #1764

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2025
Merged

Several fixes in the lazread function. #1764

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2025

Conversation

joa-quim
Copy link
Member

It now reads 1.4 RGBI but maybe broke old formats.

It now reads 1.4 RGBI but maybe broke old formats.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 18.00000% with 41 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.85%. Comparing base (3047890) to head (fe59638).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/laszip/lazread.jl 18.36% 40 Missing ⚠️
src/laszip/laszip_h.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1764      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.79%   85.85%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         167      167              
  Lines       24042    24074      +32     
==========================================
+ Hits        20628    20669      +41     
+ Misses       3414     3405       -9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joa-quim joa-quim merged commit 3d2c4e0 into master Jul 15, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@joa-quim joa-quim deleted the laszip-fixes branch July 15, 2025 00:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants