Skip to content

Ignore NaNs by deafault in sample1d. Let lowess work with NaNs. #1704

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025

Conversation

joa-quim
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 15, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 79.31034% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (master@e34b130). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/utils.jl 25.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1704   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   84.82%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      166           
  Lines             ?    23310           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    19772           
  Misses            ?     3538           
  Partials          ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joa-quim joa-quim merged commit c63422c into master Apr 15, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@joa-quim joa-quim deleted the ignore-NaNs branch April 15, 2025 00:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants