Icon Request: mobile-dynamic-island

[randomguy-2650]

Checklist

• The title of this issue starts with "Icon Request: " and is followed by the new icon name (ex. "Icon Request: Proton Torpedo")
• This icon does not represent a brand
• This request is for a single icon or a matched pair (ex. lock and unlock)
• I've already searched through existing issues, and to the best of my knowledge this request isn't a duplicate
• I understand how new icon requests work

Request type

✨ New icon

Use case

To represent the iPhone models with the Dynamic Island, as mobile-notch already exists for iPhones with a notch

Visual example

This was already mentioned by @fontawesome on X (or Twitter): https://x.com/fontawesome/status/1567600734388068353/

[sensibleworld]

Hey there!

We've made the decision to move our icon requests flow to GitHub Discussions, as opposed to issue tracking. No more +1s or thumbs-ups needed. There's an upvote system built in.

As part of this transition, we are closing existing icon requests with lower comment or reaction counts, but we are not saying no to your request. (We know some of these have been open since before I had gray hair. And I've had gray hair for a LONG time.)

Could you do us a favor? If this icon request is still relevant for you, please re-open it in Discussions (and feel free to include a link back to this issue):
→ https://github.com/FortAwesome/Font-Awesome/discussions/new?category=icon-requests

And listen. We know this is annoying. We would batch convert them to discussions if we could, but Github's removed that ability earlier this year. If you need to vent, here are some pre-written responses you can use when opening the new discussion:

• Cool cool cool. No worries at all. I love doing things twice.
• If an issue closes after seven years and nobody responds, did it ever really exist?
• I see you have chosen violence today. Re-opening per instructions.
• What's next? I have to file a TPS report, too?
• I am filled with the fury of a thousand suns. This request already HAS an auto-response saying that you're refining the workflow. What do you mean you're refining your refinement? That's a bunch of bull-phooey.
• No biggie. Thanks for letting us know what's up.