Skip to content

perf: add aggregate to lazy join #298

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

perf: add aggregate to lazy join #298

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

jbarreau
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jbarreau jbarreau force-pushed the perf/lazy_join_aggregate branch from cfcd7e1 to 34e72f9 Compare December 18, 2024 10:21
Copy link

@nicolasalexandre9 nicolasalexandre9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@jbarreau jbarreau merged commit 9e89765 into main Jan 6, 2025
52 checks passed
@jbarreau jbarreau deleted the perf/lazy_join_aggregate branch January 6, 2025 08:42
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
jbarreau added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
forest-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
## [1.20.1](v1.20.0...v1.20.1) (2025-01-06)

### Performance Improvements

* add aggregate to lazy join ([#298](#298)) ([692879a](692879a))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants