validator: text summarizer #629
Conversation
carlbrugger
force-pushed
the
feat/TextSummarizer
branch
from
3ff8b6a to
a8cdfa1
Compare
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces the Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
enrich/summarize/README.MD (3)
21-39: Improve formatting and grammar in the parameters sectionThe parameters section provides valuable information, but there are some formatting and grammar issues to address:
- Use consistent heading levels. Change the parameter headings from h4 (####) to h3 (###) for proper hierarchy.
- Add a hyphen to "full text" in the
contentFielddescription to form a compound adjective.- Add a determiner (e.g., "The") at the beginning of the
summaryLengthdescription.Here's the suggested diff for these changes:
## Parameters -#### `sheetSlug` - `string` - (required) +### `sheetSlug` - `string` - (required) The slug of the sheet to apply summarization. -#### `contentField` - `string` - (required) -The field containing the full text content. +### `contentField` - `string` - (required) +The field containing the full-text content. -#### `summaryField` - `string` - (required) +### `summaryField` - `string` - (required) The field to store the generated summary. -#### `keyPhrasesField` - `string` - (required) +### `keyPhrasesField` - `string` - (required) The field to store extracted key phrases. -#### `summaryLength` - `number` - (optional) -Number of sentences in the summary. Default is 2. +### `summaryLength` - `number` - (optional) +The number of sentences in the summary. Default is 2. -#### `summaryPercentage` - `number` - (optional) +### `summaryPercentage` - `number` - (optional) Percentage of content to include in summary.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...- (required) The field containing the full text content. ####summaryField-string...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~36-~36: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...al) Number of sentences in the summary. Default is 2. ####summaryPercentage- `numb...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)
🪛 Markdownlint
23-23: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
41-67: Improve usage section formatting and enhance code exampleThe usage section provides valuable information, but there are some improvements to be made:
- Use proper headings instead of bold text for the subsections (install, import, listener.js).
- Consider adding a brief explanation of the code example to help users understand how to customize the plugin for their needs.
Here's the suggested diff for these changes:
## Usage -**install** +### Install ```bash npm install @flatfile/plugin-enrich-summarize-import
+### Importimport { FlatfileListener } from "@flatfile/listener"; import { summarize } from "@flatfile/plugin-enrich-summarize";-listener.js
+### Example Usage
+
+The following example demonstrates how to use the summarize plugin with a FlatfileListener:
+const listener = new FlatfileListener(); listener.use( summarize({ sheetSlug: "articles", contentField: "full_text", summaryField: "summary", keyPhrasesField: "key_phrases", summaryLength: 3 }) );
+In this example, the plugin is configured to summarize the "full_text" field of the "articles" sheet,
+storing the summary in the "summary" field and key phrases in the "key_phrases" field.
+The summary is set to contain 3 sentences.These changes will improve the readability and structure of the usage section while providing more context for the code example. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 43-43: null Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) --- 48-48: null Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) --- 54-54: null Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) </blockquote></details> </details> --- `1-67`: **Consider enhancing the README with additional sections** The README provides a good overview of the plugin, its features, parameters, and usage. To further improve the documentation, consider adding the following sections: 1. **Installation**: Move the installation instructions to a separate section at the beginning of the document. 2. **Configuration**: Provide more detailed information about configuring the plugin, including any advanced options or best practices. 3. **Examples**: Add more examples showcasing different use cases or configurations of the plugin. 4. **Troubleshooting**: Include a section with common issues and their solutions. 5. **Contributing**: Add information for developers who want to contribute to the plugin. 6. **License**: Include license information for the plugin. These additional sections would make the README more comprehensive and user-friendly, providing a better resource for both new and experienced users of the plugin. <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary><blockquote> [uncategorized] ~27-~27: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen. Context: ...` - (required) The field containing the full text content. #### `summaryField` - `string... (EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL) --- [uncategorized] ~36-~36: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it. Context: ...al) Number of sentences in the summary. Default is 2. #### `summaryPercentage` - `numb... (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER) </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 23-23: Expected: h3; Actual: h4 Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time (MD001, heading-increment) --- 43-43: null Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) --- 48-48: null Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) --- 54-54: null Emphasis used instead of a heading (MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.spec.ts (3)</summary><blockquote> `14-41`: **LGTM: Test suite setup is well-structured.** The test suite setup follows Jest best practices with appropriate use of describe blocks and hooks. The beforeAll, afterAll, and afterEach hooks ensure proper test isolation and resource cleanup. Consider adding error handling in the afterAll and afterEach hooks to ensure cleanup operations are completed even if an error occurs. For example: ```typescript afterAll(async () => { try { await deleteSpace(spaceId) } catch (error) { console.error('Error during cleanup:', error) } })
52-70: LGTM: First test case covers main functionality.The test case effectively checks if the summarize plugin adds summary and key phrases to the record. It correctly verifies the presence of these fields and the expected summary length.
Consider enhancing the test with the following suggestions:
- Add assertions to check the content of the summary and key phrases, not just their presence.
- Test with different content lengths to ensure the plugin handles various input sizes correctly.
- Verify that the summary is indeed a subset of the original content.
Example:
expect(records[0].values['summary'].value).toContain('test sentence') expect(records[0].values['key_phrases'].value).toContain('test') expect((records[0].values['content'].value as string).includes(records[0].values['summary'].value as string)).toBeTruthy()
72-88: LGTM: Second test case handles empty content appropriately.The test case effectively checks how the summarize plugin handles empty content fields. It correctly verifies that summary and key phrases are undefined and that an appropriate error message is added.
Consider adding a test case for content that is not empty but too short for meaningful summarization. This would help ensure the plugin behaves correctly for various edge cases.
Example:
it('should handle very short content', async () => { listener.use(summarize(mockConfig)) await createRecords(sheetId, [{ content: 'Short.' }]) await listener.waitFor('commit:created') const records = await getRecords(sheetId) expect(records[0].values['summary'].value).toBe('Short.') expect(records[0].values['key_phrases'].value).toBe('Short') })enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.ts (1)
30-36: Clarify precedence betweensummaryLengthandsummaryPercentageWhen both
summaryLengthandsummaryPercentageare provided,summaryPercentageoverridessummaryLength. This might be confusing for users.Consider updating the documentation or adding comments to clarify this behavior, ensuring users understand which parameter takes precedence.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
enrich/summarize/metadata.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonenrich/summarize/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpackage-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.jsonpackage.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- enrich/summarize/README.MD (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/rollup.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.ts (1 hunks)
- flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- enrich/summarize/rollup.config.mjs
- enrich/summarize/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
enrich/summarize/README.MD
[uncategorized] ~27-~27: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...- (required) The field containing the full text content. ####summaryField-string...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~36-~36: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...al) Number of sentences in the summary. Default is 2. ####summaryPercentage- `numb...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER)
🪛 Markdownlint
enrich/summarize/README.MD
23-23: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
43-43: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
48-48: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
54-54: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
enrich/summarize/README.MD (2)
1-11: LGTM: Clear and informative headerThe header section provides a concise overview of the plugin, including its name, description, supported event type, and field types. This information is crucial for users to quickly understand the plugin's purpose and compatibility.
13-19: LGTM: Comprehensive feature listThe features section provides a clear and concise list of the plugin's capabilities. This helps users quickly understand what the plugin can do and its key functionalities.
enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.spec.ts (3)
1-13: LGTM: Imports and initial setup are appropriate.The necessary imports from '@flatfile/api', '@flatfile/utils-testing', and the local 'summarize.plugin' file are correctly included. The FlatfileClient instance is properly initialized for API interactions.
43-50: LGTM: Test configuration is well-defined.The mockConfig object is appropriately set up with all necessary fields for testing the summarize function. The configuration parameters seem suitable for the test scenarios.
1-89: Overall, the test file is well-structured and covers key functionality.The unit tests for the Text Summarization Plugin are comprehensive and follow good testing practices. They cover the main functionality of adding summaries and key phrases, as well as handling the edge case of empty content. The use of Jest hooks for setup and teardown is appropriate.
To further enhance the test suite, consider:
- Adding error handling in cleanup operations.
- Expanding assertions to check the content of summaries and key phrases.
- Testing with various content lengths and edge cases.
- Adding a test case for very short content.
These additions would improve the robustness and coverage of the test suite, ensuring the plugin behaves correctly across a wider range of scenarios.
flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (6)
2-2: Import statement is correctThe import of the
summarizefunction from@flatfile/plugin-enrich-summarizeis accurate.
7-11: Plugin configuration matches sheet settingsThe
summarizeplugin is configured withsheetSlugand field keys that align with the sheet definition. This ensures that the plugin operates on the correct sheet and fields.
21-22: Sheet name and slug are consistentThe sheet is defined with
name: 'Summarization'andslug: 'summarization', which matches thesheetSlugused in thesummarizeplugin configuration.
25-27: Field 'content' is properly definedThe
contentfield is correctly set up withtype: 'string'andlabel: 'Content'.
30-32: Field 'summary' is properly definedThe
summaryfield is correctly set up withtype: 'string'andlabel: 'Summary'.
35-37: Field 'keyPhrases' is properly definedThe
keyPhrasesfield is correctly set up withtype: 'string'andlabel: 'Key Phrases'.
| const keyPhrases = doc | ||
| .match('#Noun+ (#Adjective|#Noun){0,2}') | ||
| .out('array') | ||
| record.set(config.keyPhrasesField, keyPhrases.join(', ')) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check for existing key phrases before setting
While the code checks for existingSummary before generating a summary, it doesn't check if keyPhrasesField already has data before setting it.
To prevent overwriting existing key phrases, consider adding a check similar to existingSummary:
const existingKeyPhrases = record.get(config.keyPhrasesField) as string
if (!existingKeyPhrases) {
// Extract key phrases and set the field
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
enrich/summarize/jest.config.js (1)
12-12: Consider adjusting the testTimeout based on your specific test requirements.The current testTimeout is set to 60 seconds (60,000 ms). While this is a reasonable default, you might want to adjust it based on the nature of your tests. If you have particularly long-running tests, you may need to increase this value. Conversely, if your tests are typically quick, you might want to decrease it to catch potential performance issues earlier.
enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.ts (1)
13-39: Add unit tests for summarization functionalityUnit tests are essential to ensure the summarization logic works correctly and to prevent future regressions.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this functionality? I can help generate test cases to cover various scenarios.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
enrich/summarize/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- enrich/summarize/jest.config.js (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.ts (1 hunks)
- enrich/summarize/src/summary.util.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
enrich/summarize/jest.config.js (1)
1-16: LGTM! Jest configuration looks well-structured.The Jest configuration is well-organized and covers essential aspects for testing a Node.js environment with TypeScript support. The inclusion of setup files for environment variables, console logging, and cleanup is a good practice.
enrich/summarize/src/summarize.plugin.ts (2)
1-2: Imports look good!The necessary dependencies are correctly imported from the Flatfile plugin and the local utility file.
4-11: Well-structured interface definitionThe
SummarizationConfiginterface is comprehensive and clearly defines all necessary configuration options for the summarization plugin.enrich/summarize/src/summary.util.ts (3)
1-6: LGTM: Imports and interface definition look good.The import of the
compromiselibrary and the definition of theSummaryOptionsinterface are clear and appropriate for the functionality provided in this file.
1-41: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvementThe
summary.util.tsfile introduces valuable functionality for text summarization and key phrase extraction using thecompromiselibrary. The code is generally well-structured and commented. However, there are opportunities to enhance robustness, flexibility, and error handling in both main functions.Key points:
- The
generateSummaryfunction could benefit from improved handling of edge cases and more flexible summarization strategies.- The
extractKeyPhrasesfunction could be enhanced with error handling and additional options.Consider implementing the suggested improvements to make the code more robust and maintainable.
33-41: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider error handling and edge cases in
extractKeyPhrasesfunction.The function effectively uses the
compromiselibrary to extract key phrases. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling to catch potential exceptions from the
compromiselibrary.- Handle the case where no key phrases are found.
- Consider adding an option to limit the number of returned key phrases.
Here's a suggested refactor:
export function extractKeyPhrases(content: string, limit?: number): string[] { try { const doc = nlp(content); const phrases = doc.match('#Adjective? #Adjective? #Noun+').out('array'); return limit ? phrases.slice(0, limit) : phrases; } catch (error) { console.error('Error extracting key phrases:', error); return []; } }This version adds basic error handling and an optional
limitparameter.To ensure the function works as expected with various inputs, please run the following test cases:
These tests will help verify the function's behavior with different inputs and the proposed
limitparameter.
Please explain how to summarize this PR for the Changelog:
Tell code reviewer how and what to test: