Skip to content

Inconsistencies with GetRecentTradesAsync / GetHistoricalTradesAsync across Exchanges #508

Closed
@GonzoKK

Description

@GonzoKK

I have just started to delve into this and will add comments/feedback as I go...

For consistency across exchanges - I would prefer GetRecentTradesAsync and/or GetHistoricalTradesAsync to accept a numerical limit (eg 100) on number of Trades. It currently varies wildly, for example...

Binance
✓ GetRecentTradesAsync: (ETHBTC) 4984 items [3,972s]
✓ GetHistoricalTradesAsync: (ETHBTC) 4978 items [1,632s]
Bittrex
✓ GetRecentTradesAsync: (BTC-RVN) 100 items [0,351s]
✓ GetHistoricalTradesAsync: (BTC-RVN) 14400 items [2,190s]
HitBTC
✓ GetRecentTradesAsync: (BCNBTC) 10 items [0,009s]
✓ GetHistoricalTradesAsync: (BCNBTC) 100 items [0,300s]

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions