Skip to content

Update aggregation key processor documentation to reflect new source inclusion changes #30018

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fraseriver
Copy link
Contributor

@fraseriver fraseriver commented Jun 18, 2025

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

ECT-3509

An additional line has been added to this documentation to reflect that @evt.source_id and @evt.integration_id are now always included in the aggregation key generation, meaning events with different sources will always have distinct aggregation keys.

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

@fraseriver fraseriver requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2025 18:34
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 18, 2025

✅ Documentation Team Review

The documentation team has approved this pull request. Thank you for your contribution!

Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

@buraizu buraizu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor edit per the style guide

@fraseriver fraseriver requested a review from buraizu June 18, 2025 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants