[ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.1 #40182

pgimalac · 2025-08-25T08:16:01Z

What does this PR do?

Update testify to v1.11.1 https://github.com/stretchr/testify/releases/tag/v1.11.1

Motivation

Benefit from stretchr/testify#1427 (assert: check early in Eventually, EventuallyWithT, and Never).

Describe how you validated your changes

CI

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

The change means that some assertions now succeed earlier, which can make following assertions fail...
I had to fix various tests and increase some timeouts to avoid that.

cit-pr-commenter · 2025-08-25T09:01:29Z

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: d700970f-7b12-4ea9-a5bd-1d0702e37d6f

Baseline: b5f3d90
Comparison: d5553fa
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	-6.23	[-9.25, -3.21]	1	Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.86	[+0.80, +0.92]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_metrics	memory utilization	+0.68	[+0.56, +0.81]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter	memory utilization	+0.44	[+0.24, +0.63]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.17	[+0.13, +0.20]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.06	[-0.60, +0.73]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_logs	memory utilization	+0.05	[+0.00, +0.10]	1	Logs
➖	otlp_ingest_logs	memory utilization	+0.04	[-0.07, +0.15]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative	memory utilization	+0.02	[-0.11, +0.14]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.01, +0.01]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.25, +0.25]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	-0.02	[-0.06, +0.02]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.03	[-0.61, +0.54]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.05	[-0.58, +0.49]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.07	[-0.65, +0.51]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders	memory utilization	-0.12	[-0.17, -0.08]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics	memory utilization	-0.20	[-0.37, -0.03]	1	Logs
➖	ddot_metrics_sum_delta	memory utilization	-0.81	[-0.96, -0.65]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-1.04	[-1.10, -0.98]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-1.66	[-4.42, +1.11]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	-1.69	[-1.89, -1.48]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	docker_containers_memory	memory utilization	-4.98	[-5.14, -4.82]	1	Logs
✅	docker_containers_cpu	% cpu utilization	-6.23	[-9.25, -3.21]	1	Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
✅	docker_containers_cpu	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	memory_usage	10/10
✅	docker_containers_memory	simple_check_run	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	lost_bytes	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

agent-platform-auto-pr · 2025-08-25T10:23:18Z

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor b5f3d90

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Delta	On disk size (MiB)	Delta	On wire size (MiB)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${697.13}$$ < $${703.13}$$	$${+0.02}$$	$${175.45}$$ < $${178.38}$$
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	$${0}$$	$${691.63}$$ < $${697.61}$$	$${+0.02}$$	$${174.02}$$ < $${177.15}$$
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	$${0}$$	$${335.91}$$ < $${341.62}$$	$${-0}$$	$${88.94}$$ < $${91.52}$$
✅	agent_msi	$${0}$$	$${988.67}$$ < $${990.42}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${150.88}$$ < $${152.42}$$
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${697.12}$$ < $${703.12}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${177.79}$$ < $${180.53}$$
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	$${0}$$	$${691.62}$$ < $${697.6}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${176.19}$$ < $${178.87}$$
✅	agent_rpm_arm64	$${0}$$	$${683.25}$$ < $${689.82}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${159.07}$$ < $${162.16}$$
✅	agent_rpm_arm64_fips	$${0}$$	$${678.76}$$ < $${685.08}$$	$${+0.02}$$	$${157.95}$$ < $${161.11}$$
✅	agent_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${697.12}$$ < $${703.12}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${177.79}$$ < $${180.53}$$
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	$${0}$$	$${691.62}$$ < $${697.6}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${176.19}$$ < $${178.87}$$
✅	agent_suse_arm64	$${0}$$	$${683.25}$$ < $${689.82}$$	$${+0.01}$$	$${159.07}$$ < $${162.16}$$
✅	agent_suse_arm64_fips	$${0}$$	$${678.76}$$ < $${685.08}$$	$${+0.02}$$	$${157.95}$$ < $${161.11}$$
✅	docker_agent_amd64	$${0}$$	$${768.51}$$ < $${774.54}$$	$${+0}$$	$${263.2}$$ < $${266.46}$$
✅	docker_agent_arm64	$${+0}$$	$${778.58}$$ < $${785.2}$$	$${-0}$$	$${249.27}$$ < $${252.92}$$
✅	docker_agent_jmx_amd64	$${+0}$$	$${959.37}$$ < $${965.41}$$	$${+0}$$	$${331.82}$$ < $${335.08}$$
✅	docker_agent_jmx_arm64	$${-0}$$	$${958.04}$$ < $${964.66}$$	$${-0}$$	$${313.88}$$ < $${317.54}$$
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	$${0}$$	$${212.85}$$ < $${213.74}$$	$${-0}$$	$${72.2}$$ < $${73.2}$$
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	$${+0}$$	$${228.8}$$ < $${229.68}$$	$${+0}$$	$${68.49}$$ < $${69.48}$$
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	$${0}$$	$${7.06}$$ < $${7.12}$$	$${+0}$$	$${2.95}$$ < $${3.29}$$
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	$${0}$$	$${6.69}$$ < $${6.92}$$	$${+0}$$	$${2.7}$$ < $${3.07}$$
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	$${0}$$	$${38.39}$$ < $${39.3}$$	$${0}$$	$${14.83}$$ < $${15.76}$$
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	$${0}$$	$${37.05}$$ < $${37.94}$$	$${-0}$$	$${14.28}$$ < $${14.83}$$
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${29.62}$$ < $${30.53}$$	$${-0}$$	$${7.82}$$ < $${8.75}$$
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	$${0}$$	$${28.21}$$ < $${29.12}$$	$${+0}$$	$${6.77}$$ < $${7.71}$$
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${29.62}$$ < $${30.53}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.83}$$ < $${8.77}$$
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${29.62}$$ < $${30.53}$$	$${+0}$$	$${7.83}$$ < $${8.77}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	$${0}$$	$${54.57}$$ < $${54.97}$$	$${-0}$$	$${13.64}$$ < $${14.45}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	$${0}$$	$${51.85}$$ < $${51.9}$$	$${+0}$$	$${11.76}$$ < $${12.63}$$
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	$${0}$$	$${51.38}$$ < $${51.84}$$	$${-0}$$	$${11.84}$$ < $${12.74}$$
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	$${0}$$	$${54.57}$$ < $${54.97}$$	$${-0}$$	$${13.66}$$ < $${14.47}$$
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	$${0}$$	$${54.57}$$ < $${54.97}$$	$${-0}$$	$${13.66}$$ < $${14.47}$$

…/bump-testify

louis-cqrl

LGTM for arun files

pducolin · 2025-09-23T13:22:55Z

Omg they finally merged this fix!

BaptisteFoy

lgtm for fleet

pducolin · 2025-09-23T13:44:23Z

pkg/gpu/probe_test.go

-		require.Equal(t, value, actualEvents[evName], "event %s count mismatch", evName)
-		delete(actualEvents, evName)
-	}
+	require.EventuallyWithT(t, func(c *assert.CollectT) {


❓ question
Do we need these changes on .go files? They make the PR blurrier, are they a consequence of the bump?

Yes it's a consequence
Basically the timing change in Eventually[WithT] made various tests flaky, I fixed most of them in a separate PR, but KMT tests were particularly tricky and had to be fixed by owning teams (who pushed to this PR)
I could technically split those commits in separate PRs too, but it seemed simpler to just keep the current state

…/bump-testify

pgimalac · 2025-09-29T14:04:21Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-09-29T14:04:25Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-09-29 14:04:25 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-09-29 14:04:33 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-09-29 18:05:03 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

pgimalac · 2025-09-30T10:53:23Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-09-30T10:53:27Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-09-30 10:53:26 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-09-30 10:53:38 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

2025-09-30 11:09:19 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 37m (p90).

2025-09-30 11:11:40 UTC 🚨 MergeQueue: This merge request is in error because of GitLab

Gitlab pipeline didn't start... Please retry.

Error: gitlab pipeline not started

pgimalac · 2025-09-30T11:14:36Z

/merge

dd-devflow-routing-codex · 2025-09-30T11:14:40Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-09-30 11:14:40 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2025-09-30 11:14:45 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 37m (p90).

2025-09-30 12:01:56 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

### What does this PR do? Ensure that e2e tests are using testify v1.11.1 to benefit from stretchr/testify#1427. ### Motivation With the merge of #40182, I expected the elapsed time of containers e2e tests to be significantly reduced. Indeed, most of the tests are just waiting with an `EventuallyWithT` for an assertion against fake intake data to become true. And, most of the time, the assertion should be true at the first try. So, the 10+s of elapsed for the tests was coming from the `EventuallyWithT` initial try. And, according to [this CI page](https://app.datadoghq.com/ci/test/runs?query=test_level%3Atest%20%40test.service%3Adatadog-agent%20%40git.branch%3Amain%20%40test.suite%3A%22github.com%2FDataDog%2Fdatadog-agent%2Ftest%2Fnew-e2e%2Ftests%2Fcontainers%22%20%40test.name%3A%22TestEKSSuite%2FTestNginx%2Fmetric___network.http.response_time%7B%5Ekube_namespace%3Aworkload-nginx%24%7D%22&citest_explorer_sort=time%2Cdesc&currentTab=overview&eventStack=&fromUser=false&index=citest&mode=sliding&saved-view-id=2236559&start=1759918899379&end=1760523699379&paused=false), containers e2e tests are still lasting more than 10s despite the merge of #40182. ### Describe how you validated your changes I checked the *real* version of testify used by the e2e tests by: * starting them with: `dda inv -- -e new-e2e-tests.run --targets ./tests/containers --run TestEKSSuite` * looking for the test binary with: `pstree -p $(pgrep konsole)` * and finally checking the testify version with: `strings /proc/80184/exe | grep testify | grep v1.1` Before this PR, I had: ``` lenaic@lenaic-Precision-5570:~$ strings /proc/80184/exe | grep testify | grep v1.1 /home/lenaic/go/pkg/mod/github.com/stretchr/[email protected]/assert/assertion_compare.go /home/lenaic/go/pkg/mod/github.com/stretchr/[email protected]/assert/assertion_format.go /home/lenaic/go/pkg/mod/github.com/stretchr/[email protected]/assert/assertion_order.go […] ``` With this PR, I now have: ``` lenaic@lenaic-Precision-5570:~$ strings /proc/90732/exe | grep testify | grep v1.1 /home/lenaic/go/pkg/mod/github.com/stretchr/[email protected]/assert/assertion_compare.go /home/lenaic/go/pkg/mod/github.com/stretchr/[email protected]/assert/assertion_format.go /home/lenaic/go/pkg/mod/github.com/stretchr/[email protected]/assert/assertion_order.go […] ``` ### Additional Notes

github-actions bot added component/system-probe team/agent-devx long review PR is complex, plan time to review it labels Aug 25, 2025

pgimalac added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Aug 25, 2025

pgimalac changed the title ~~Update testify to v1.11.0~~ [ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.0 Aug 25, 2025

pgimalac added 2 commits August 25, 2025 17:49

chore: bump testify to 1.11.0

0528d8c

fix: fix more uses of Eventually

46ddae6

pgimalac force-pushed the pgimalac/bump-testify branch from 41aa326 to 46ddae6 Compare August 25, 2025 17:21

Fix TestCanReceiveEvents

ec7adf8

pgimalac changed the title ~~[ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.0~~ [ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.1 Aug 28, 2025

pgimalac added 17 commits August 28, 2025 15:30

chore: update testify to 1.11.1

46a9ca5

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

c3acaef

…/bump-testify

fix: use require instead of assert to avoid crashing

c120f16

fix: some incorrect uses of testify

c0c86a2

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

105aaa0

…/bump-testify

Merge branch 'main' into pgimalac/bump-testify

667d00c

fix: tidy

a96819d

fix: replace uses of assert with require to fix segfault

736864b

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

21e6077

…/bump-testify

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

0cf76d4

…/bump-testify

fix: hpa controller test race

af73ad3

fix: increase timeout in kmt tests

d96901e

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

d092c86

…/bump-testify

fix: nmp e2e test flakiness

fe08292

fix: kmt network tests

138077e

fix: kmt network tests

931a56d

chore: add logs to ease debugging

9d28ff9

pgimalac requested review from a team as code owners September 23, 2025 12:58

pgimalac requested review from AyyLam and fabbing September 23, 2025 12:58

pgimalac added the ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR label Sep 23, 2025

louis-cqrl approved these changes Sep 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

mbertrone approved these changes Sep 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

BaptisteFoy approved these changes Sep 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

pducolin reviewed Sep 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

pducolin approved these changes Sep 23, 2025

View reviewed changes

pimlu approved these changes Sep 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

pgimalac added 4 commits September 25, 2025 01:18

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

7af3ac9

…/bump-testify

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

afad770

…/bump-testify

Merge branch 'main' of github.com:DataDog/datadog-agent into pgimalac…

0787c54

…/bump-testify

Merge branch 'main' into pgimalac/bump-testify

d5553fa

dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 9e9fd8d into main Sep 30, 2025
570 of 574 checks passed

dd-mergequeue bot deleted the pgimalac/bump-testify branch September 30, 2025 12:01

github-actions bot added this to the 7.72.0 milestone Sep 30, 2025

L3n41c mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2025

[ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.1 #41981

Merged

[ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.1 #40182

[ACIX-835] Update testify to v1.11.1 #40182

Uh oh!

Conversation

pgimalac commented Aug 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Aug 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Fine details of change detection per experiment

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

Explanation

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Uh oh!

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Aug 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Static quality checks

Info

Uh oh!

louis-cqrl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pducolin commented Sep 23, 2025

Uh oh!

BaptisteFoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pducolin Sep 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pgimalac Sep 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pgimalac commented Sep 29, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Sep 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pgimalac commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Sep 30, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pgimalac commented Sep 30, 2025

Uh oh!

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Sep 30, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

pgimalac commented Aug 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Aug 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Aug 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Sep 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Sep 30, 2025 •

edited

Loading

dd-devflow-routing-codex bot commented Sep 30, 2025 •

edited

Loading