Conversation
I think it's worth it because if you have codecov set up, it tells you if your PR has enough diff coverage. I had this in CosmWasm/cosmwasm#1286 where the tool made me add more tests to pass the codecov checks. |
webmaster128
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like a good start. I'd add a codecov config as otherwise you hardly have visibility of the results.
Nice. I'll copy / adapt it from cosmwasm. |
|
Also have a look at https://github.com/CosmWasm/cosmwasm/blob/main/codecov.yml, especially the first line avoids annoying GitHub comments from the codecov bot. |
ada60bd to
240ddae
Compare
240ddae to
966eab9
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #715 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 92.04%
=======================================
Files ? 98
Lines ? 13446
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 12376
Misses ? 1070
Partials ? 0 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Run coverage as part of tests
Closes #172.
Running this in all dev branches seems overkill. It also takes ~8 minutes to run.