Skip to content

Conversation

@dominicfallows
Copy link
Contributor

@dominicfallows dominicfallows commented Dec 22, 2025

Relevant issues

N/A

Type

🆕 New Feature

Changes

  • Add the request to a model/endpoint to log view screens
  • Fix empty model
  • New build of Admin UI

Images

Showing new Request to model/endpoint section - notice this has a system prompt included that can be added via LiteLLM Prompt Management

Screenshot 2025-12-22 at 15 01 53

Showing help message in new section - users require the correct config to store messages to DB

Screenshot 2025-12-22 at 15 18 04

Tests

UI tests

Screenshot 2025-12-22 at 15 26 21

Python tests

Screenshot 2025-12-22 at 15 30 23

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

  • I have Added testing in the tests/litellm/ directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see details
  • My PR passes all unit tests on make test-unit
  • My PR's scope is as isolated as possible, it only solves 1 specific problem

CI (LiteLLM team)

CI status guideline:

  • 50-55 passing tests: main is stable with minor issues.
  • 45-49 passing tests: acceptable but needs attention
  • <= 40 passing tests: unstable; be careful with your merges and assess the risk.
  • Branch creation CI run
    Link:

  • CI run for the last commit
    Link:

  • Merge / cherry-pick CI run
    Links:

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
litellm Ready Ready Preview, Comment Dec 22, 2025 3:36pm

@dominicfallows
Copy link
Contributor Author

Two points:

  • I couldn't find any documentation for this, but seeing the out folder stored in the repo made me presume I needed to rebuild and commit
  • Tests seem to be failing on code outside of the changed files in this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant