Skip to content

PSOC6: Updated default M0 image to not modify UDB configuration when… #9157

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2018

Conversation

lrusinowicz
Copy link
Contributor

… coming out of a deep sleep state.

On Mbed this is performed only on M4 core.
This updated M0 behavior is required for a RGB LEDs driver for Sequana board that I've just made available.
I'm attaching mbed test results (no change).
tests_sequana_gcc_20181219_3.log

Description

Pull request type

[ ] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[x] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

… comming out of a deep sleep state.

On Mbed this is performed only on M4 core.
@0xc0170 0xc0170 changed the title [PSOC6] Updated default M0 image to not modify UDB configuration when… PSOC6: Updated default M0 image to not modify UDB configuration when… Dec 19, 2018
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Dec 19, 2018

recommend using format PSOC6: rather than [PSOC6]. I updated the title

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ README for pre-compiled PSoC 6 Cortex M0+ core images

This folder contains precompiled program images for the CM0+ core of the PSoC 6(63xx) MCU suitable for use with MBed OS applications running on CM4 core. Two images are available:

* `psoc63_m0_default_1.01.hex`
* `psoc63_m0_default_1.02.hex`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this follow your versioning (not just dropping latest image here as a replacement rather than remove + add ) ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we'd like to keep control of the binary version being used, so we can be sure all the fixes are in place.

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team December 19, 2018 14:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@lrusinowicz, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Dec 19, 2018

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Dec 19, 2018

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 11 of 11 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants