Skip to content

MASTER - LICENSE.md - clarify filesystem licensing #13276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020

Conversation

JanneKiiskila
Copy link
Contributor

We should really specify the littlefs and FAT FS licensing as separate
items, we should not just lump them together.

I also think we should point where the originals were picked up from.

Impact of changes

Documentation.

Migration actions required

None.

Documentation

Self-documenting.


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[x] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers @geky


@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested review from geky and a team July 10, 2020 23:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@JanneKiiskila, thank you for your changes.
@geky @ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jul 13, 2020

Thanks !

I also think we should point where the originals were picked up from.

👍

LICENSE.md Outdated
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ Folders containing files under different permissive license than Apache 2.0 are
- [features/lorawan](./features/lorawan) - Revised BSD
- [features/lwipstack](./features/lwipstack) - BSD-style, MIT-style
- [features/nanostack/sal-stack-nanostack](./features/nanostack/sal-stack-nanostack) - BSD-3-Clause
- [features/storage](./features/storage) - BSD-style, MIT
- [features/storage/filesystem/littlefs](./features/storage/filesystem/littlefs) - [BSD-3-Clause](https://github.com/ARMmbed/littlefs/blob/master/LICENSE.md)
- [features/storage/filesystem/fat/ChaN](.features/storage/filesystem/fat/ChaN) - BSD-style, 1 clause, [Copyright ChaN](http://www.elm-chan.org/fsw/ff/doc/appnote.html)
Copy link
Contributor

@0xc0170 0xc0170 Jul 13, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One note: some of the files in features\storage\blockdevice are released under MIT. Lets add it as well

@mergify mergify bot dismissed 0xc0170’s stale review July 16, 2020 11:26

Pull request has been modified.

0xc0170
0xc0170 previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2020
@0xc0170 0xc0170 added needs: CI release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch and removed needs: work labels Jul 16, 2020
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Jul 17, 2020

This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them.

@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

@JanneKiiskila could you rebase this please

Janne Kiiskila added 2 commits July 17, 2020 13:33
We should really specify the littlefs and FAT FS licensing as separate
items, we should not just lump them together.

I also think we should point where the originals were picked up from.
They are a seemingly random mix of Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.
@JanneKiiskila
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased.

@mergify mergify bot dismissed 0xc0170’s stale review July 17, 2020 10:36

Pull request has been modified.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Jul 20, 2020

Quick Ci check and should be good to go in

@mergify mergify bot removed the needs: CI label Jul 20, 2020
@0xc0170 0xc0170 merged commit e5e556f into ARMmbed:master Jul 20, 2020
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Jul 20, 2020
@mbedmain mbedmain added release-version: 6.2.1 Release-pending and removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Aug 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants