Skip to content

NRF52 need to call TIMER_TASK_SHUTDOWN for current consumption #11123

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2019

Conversation

desmond-blue
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Since current consumption increased when the timer has been running and only the STOP task is used to stop on nRF52x, we need to call SHUTDOWN task after STOP task.

reference for nRF52840
reference for nRF52832

Pull request type

[x] Fix
[ ] Refactor
[ ] Target update
[ ] Functionality change
[ ] Docs update
[ ] Test update
[ ] Breaking change

Reviewers

Release Notes

@40Grit
Copy link

40Grit commented Jul 30, 2019

@AGlass0fMilk

@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team July 30, 2019 11:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@desmond-blue, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@bulislaw
Copy link
Member

Thanks @desmond-blue,
have you run the ticker tests on the boards after the change?

@desmond-blue
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bulislaw I only ran the ticker/timer tests on nRF52840_DK, which is all I have. Could we access CI and run our own test job?

@bulislaw
Copy link
Member

bulislaw commented Aug 2, 2019

I don't think we have this board in the CI at this stage. But your testing sounds like it should do for now.

Copy link
Member

@bulislaw bulislaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM @linlingao fyi

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Aug 5, 2019

Test run: SUCCESS

Summary: 11 of 11 test jobs passed
Build number : 1
Build artifacts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants