Details
In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition
if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset
uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.
This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.
PoC
use bytes::*;
fn main() {
let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
let mut b = a.split_off(5);
// Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
drop(a);
// Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);
// This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
b.put_u8(b'h');
}
Workarounds
Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.
This vulnerability is also known as RUSTSEC-2026-0007.
Details
In the unique reclaim path of
BytesMut::reserve, the conditionif v_capacity >= new_cap + offsetuses an unchecked addition. When
new_cap + offsetoverflowsusizein release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causingself.capto be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such asspare_capacity_mut()then trust this corruptedcapvalue and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.
PoC
Workarounds
Users of
BytesMut::reserveare only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.This vulnerability is also known as RUSTSEC-2026-0007.